The ridiculous hijack in the other thread bored me, so I'm starting my own on the interesting aspect (to me) of her talk.
It seems that the most unconventional aspect of her advice is the mixing of Jesus Christ, the Holy Ghost, and sex. Why does this feel like such strange advice? Is it because we're all inundated with sexuality in society with nary a mention of Jesus, so the mixing feels strange? Or is it because sex is essentially messy, dirty, and appealing to our basest instincts, so we have a hard time mixing this with the pearly white image of Jesus that we have grown up with? Or maybe both?
It seems to me that if we truly believe what we tell our teenagers--that sex is sacred--then we wouldn't have a problem with the statements she makes. Problem is, I don't think most of us believe what we preach (including me). Maybe that means I need to change. Maybe that means our teaching needs to change. But a 270-post argument on the subject means there's a disconnect.
As I've thought about it, I'm not sure that the sexual act is sacred, as we typically define it. The power of procreation is a sacred one, which is why none of us have any problem associating the Holy Ghost with a moment of birth (also messy and pretty disgusting). Sex can have a very powerful effect on emotions. I think this is where we need to focus our teachings to adolescents. They don't buy that it's sacred either.
It seems that the most unconventional aspect of her advice is the mixing of Jesus Christ, the Holy Ghost, and sex. Why does this feel like such strange advice? Is it because we're all inundated with sexuality in society with nary a mention of Jesus, so the mixing feels strange? Or is it because sex is essentially messy, dirty, and appealing to our basest instincts, so we have a hard time mixing this with the pearly white image of Jesus that we have grown up with? Or maybe both?
It seems to me that if we truly believe what we tell our teenagers--that sex is sacred--then we wouldn't have a problem with the statements she makes. Problem is, I don't think most of us believe what we preach (including me). Maybe that means I need to change. Maybe that means our teaching needs to change. But a 270-post argument on the subject means there's a disconnect.
As I've thought about it, I'm not sure that the sexual act is sacred, as we typically define it. The power of procreation is a sacred one, which is why none of us have any problem associating the Holy Ghost with a moment of birth (also messy and pretty disgusting). Sex can have a very powerful effect on emotions. I think this is where we need to focus our teachings to adolescents. They don't buy that it's sacred either.
Comment