Finished Enduring Battle - fascinating. It has a very academic feel to it, doesn't flow particularly well and is a bit dry in spots, but I thought it was well worth the read. The book has the same feel as John Keegan's Face of Battle
Hammer contrasts the infantry soldier experience in the Revolutionary War, Civil War and WW II. He looks at how the changing weapons and tactics changed their experience and how the way war was waged changed the way soldiers were motivated to overcome their natural flight responses.
Some of his conclusions are that the main difference between the civil war and the Revolution is in scale - He uses the Battle of Cowpens and the Shiloh to illustrate this. Cowpens was over in about 30 minutes or so while Shiloh took 2 days. Also more men died at Shiloh that fought at Cowpens (about 3000 deaths vs 2900 participants on both sides). By WWII the indivual soldier basically stayed in combat until either the war was over or he became a casuality.
The size of the battle fields also changed - Cowpens was a couple of acres, Shiloh a couple of square miles and the Battle of the Bulge/Hurtgen Forest was 100's of miles long
Hammer hypothises there are 3 major things that keep men fighting
1-training
2-leadership
3-companionship
He also looks at how those three things have changed over the last 200+ yrs.
Currently reading Bernard Cornwell's latest
[ame="http://www.amazon.com/Death-Kings-Novel-Saxon-Tales/dp/0061969656/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1330811431&sr=1-1"]Amazon.com: Death of Kings: A Novel (Saxon Tales) (9780061969652): Bernard Cornwell: Books@@AMEPARAM@@http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51xVj7SPJ3L.@@AMEPARAM@@51xVj7SPJ3L[/ame]
This is the latest entry into the Saxon tales series
Hammer contrasts the infantry soldier experience in the Revolutionary War, Civil War and WW II. He looks at how the changing weapons and tactics changed their experience and how the way war was waged changed the way soldiers were motivated to overcome their natural flight responses.
Some of his conclusions are that the main difference between the civil war and the Revolution is in scale - He uses the Battle of Cowpens and the Shiloh to illustrate this. Cowpens was over in about 30 minutes or so while Shiloh took 2 days. Also more men died at Shiloh that fought at Cowpens (about 3000 deaths vs 2900 participants on both sides). By WWII the indivual soldier basically stayed in combat until either the war was over or he became a casuality.
The size of the battle fields also changed - Cowpens was a couple of acres, Shiloh a couple of square miles and the Battle of the Bulge/Hurtgen Forest was 100's of miles long
Hammer hypothises there are 3 major things that keep men fighting
1-training
2-leadership
3-companionship
He also looks at how those three things have changed over the last 200+ yrs.
Currently reading Bernard Cornwell's latest
[ame="http://www.amazon.com/Death-Kings-Novel-Saxon-Tales/dp/0061969656/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1330811431&sr=1-1"]Amazon.com: Death of Kings: A Novel (Saxon Tales) (9780061969652): Bernard Cornwell: Books@@AMEPARAM@@http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51xVj7SPJ3L.@@AMEPARAM@@51xVj7SPJ3L[/ame]
This is the latest entry into the Saxon tales series
Worth the read if you like that sort of thing ( and I do )
Comment