Originally posted by LiveCoug
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
What Are You Reading Now?
Collapse
X
-
He didn't say that corporations aren't real. He said they're an abstraction, like a myth or money. But that is not the deep insight. The insight is that the corporate form is was as important to the rise of the West and its dominance as the invention of the wheel to humankind and his lay person's explanations and examples for why that's so.Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post
Lol. You could’ve said that without sounding so condescending.
And I already very clearly said they were parts of it that I really liked.
Most religious people don't like his books very much.When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.
--Jonathan Swift
Comment
-
Oh I get it. Just didn't seem that profound to me.Originally posted by SeattleUte View Post
He didn't say that corporations aren't real. He said they're an abstraction, like a myth or money. But that is not the deep insight. The insight is that the corporate form is was as important to the rise of the West and its dominance as the invention of the wheel to humankind and his lay person's explanations and examples for why that's so.
He has an overly simplistic and ham-fisted approach to religion, for sure.Originally posted by SeattleUte View PostMost religious people don't like his books very much.
This guy does a pretty good job dissecting the flaws in the book:
https://www.bethinking.org/human-life/sapiens-review
I would classify the book as "pop scientism"."There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
"It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
"Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster
Comment
-
SU will love that review:Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post
Oh I get it. Just didn't seem that profound to me.
He has an overly simplistic and ham-fisted approach to religion, for sure.
This guy does a pretty good job dissecting the flaws in the book:
https://www.bethinking.org/human-life/sapiens-review
I would classify the book as "pop scientism".
His failure to think clearly and objectively in areas outside his field will leave educated Christians unimpressed."I think it was King Benjamin who said 'you sorry ass shitbags who have no skills that the market values also have an obligation to have the attitude that if one day you do in fact win the PowerBall Lottery that you will then impart of your substance to those without.'"
- Goatnapper'96
Comment
-
There are three great novels I've read that dramatizes Stalingrad. Life and Fate, Europe Central, and The Kindly Ones. All three have a scene with an unknown soldier playing the grand piano outside in the freezing air and snow amid destroyed Stalingrad, and captivating both sides. Something like that must have really happened. One of those scenes that's for a novelist too good to pass up.Originally posted by SteelBlue View PostLife and Fate by Vasily Grossman. Build up to the battle of Stalingrad. Ends up feeling quite timely with fascism rearing its head again.When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.
--Jonathan Swift
- 1 like
Comment
-
I knew the source of the ridicule of Harari. I'm very insightful about such things.Originally posted by Pelado View Post
SU will love that review:
His main thesis is that humans are successful because they have language, which enables them to collaborate, and the glue for collaboration is stories. Religion is just another of those stories, along with money, corporations, nations, human rights, capitalism, etc. No more no less, except it's not even the most important story.When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.
--Jonathan Swift
Comment
-
FTR, I thought his predictions of the future with robots and AI taking over was way over the top to the point of being comical. I have mentioned that before, but you choose to ignore it because it doesn't confirm your bias against me.Originally posted by SeattleUte View Post
I knew the source of the ridicule of Harari. I'm very insightful about such things.
His main thesis is that humans are successful because they have language, which enables them to collaborate, and the glue for collaboration is stories. Religion is just another of those stories, along with money, corporations, nations, human rights, capitalism, etc. No more no less, except it's not even the most important story.
Humans are different because we have languages and stories? Wow, that is deep."There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
"It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
"Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster
Comment
-
An Inconvenient Truth by Al Gore
I decided to read it again and see if it seems more believable now than when I read it after it first came out. Some things are not happening as fast as he was predicting, like the disappearance of of some glaciers, but other stuff is happening faster than he predicted too.
I think maybe we should have listened a bit more closely to what he had to say 15 years ago.
- 1 like
Comment
-
-
Was lucky and got galleys for the new George Saunders short story collection Liberation Day, and the new Adam Sternbergh novel The Eden Test.
Saunders collection is good. Nine stories but only 4 that have never been published. My favorite was Ghoul which you can read free on the New Yorker website. The titular story, Liberation Day was also strong. I liked them all, but I am admittedly a Saunders fanboy. I'd say if you like Saunders you'll like the collection and if you don't there's nothing here that's going to move the needle for you.
The Eden Test was a cool idea and I could see it as a 4 episode Netflix series. As a novel it didn't work for me as well as I wanted it to. I love Sternbergh's stuff.and went into this one really wanting to like it. I feel like his editor let him down. Lots of instances where I could feel the chapters had been written at far different times and the editor had missed that Sternbergh hammered a point in the previous chapter and then reintroduces it in the next as though you'd never heard it. It comes across as a dumbing down at times which is not something Sternbergh has done in previous novels. The book ended up feeling like a good idea but relied too heavily on deus ex machina and I found myself rolling my eyes with increasing frequency. Fun, but not up to Sternbergh''s normal high standard imo.
Comment
Comment