If the Academy of Motion Picture had to do it over again

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Green Lantern
    Has overcome great fear
    • Aug 2009
    • 2289

    #16
    Originally posted by Mormon Red Death View Post
    Really? Have you rewatched et once since you were 7? The movie sucks. Its slow and really boring.
    Sent from my T-Mobile myTouch 3G Slide using Tapatalk
    Are you talking about Gandhi? Because you can't be talking about E.T. Have you rewatched it lately? I'll defend that movie as Spielberg's crowning achievement. And that guy's no slouch.
    Kids in general these days seem more socially retarded...

    None of them date. They hang out. They text. They sit in the same car or room and don't say a word...they text. Then, they go home and whack off to internet porn.

    I think that's the sad truth about why these kids are retards.

    --Portland Ute

    Comment

    • John McClain
      Comfortably Numb
      • Dec 2009
      • 1012

      #17
      Originally posted by marsupial View Post
      While this is true, I LOVED Shakespeare in Love. Loved it!
      Chick Flick.
      Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.
      Albert Einstein

      Comment

      • Paperback Writer
        Signature won a Pulitzer
        • Nov 2010
        • 5211

        #18
        Originally posted by Color Me Badd Fan View Post
        Also, I think this list of AFI's top 100 is interesting. I doubt Blade Runner would have sniffed a list like this had one existed just a year or two after it came out. Sometimes it takes time to realize which is the best film. Dances With Wolves didn't even make the list, Goodfellas wasn't very high either though. Shawshank ranks higher than Forest Gump and Pulp Fiction and Gump ranks higher than Pulp Fiction. However Raging Bull is ranked #4 and I thought Ordinary People (not on the list) was deserving in the same year.



        Also -- 1976 was a helluva year for movies-- four movies from that year made it on the list: Rocky, Network, All the President's Men and Taxi Driver.
        I'm familar with the AFI list. What is interesting is to compare the original AFI top 100 with the 10-year anniversary that you linked. On the original list, Dances with Wolves is #75 and Goodfellas is #94. That would seem to support your view of Dances with Wolves not aging well and Goodfellas holding on.

        Also on the original AFI rankings, Forrest Gump is #71, Pulp Fiction #95, and Shawshank Redemption is unranked. It's interesting how peoples' perceptions can change over time as a film is still the same. I don't understand it as I don't think my rankings would change all that much unless some of the lower ranked films fell off to make room for recent additions. I thought Blade Runner was excellent when it was released. So Shawshank Redemption gets a deserved ranking in the 10-year anniversity (and jumps Forrest Gump and Pulp Fiction in the process) but yet Dances with Wolves goes to the abyss of the unranked. Wonder if the AFI 20-year anniversity will put Dances with Wolves back on the rankings along with Oridnary People (A film I greatly enjoyed).

        Link to the original AFI list:
        “Not the victory but the action. Not the goal but the game. In the deed the glory.”
        "All things are measured against Nebraska." falafel

        Comment

        • MartyFunkhouser
          Disciple of RNGesus
          • Nov 2008
          • 18720

          #19
          1964: Dr. Strangelove
          1996: Fargo
          As I lead this army, make room for mistakes and depression
          --Kendrick Lamar

          Comment

          • Paperback Writer
            Signature won a Pulitzer
            • Nov 2010
            • 5211

            #20
            Originally posted by Green Lantern View Post
            Are you talking about Gandhi? Because you can't be talking about E.T. Have you rewatched it lately? I'll defend that movie as Spielberg's crowning achievement. And that guy's no slouch.
            Anyone with kids has watched ET multiple times. I agree with it possibly being Spielberg's crowning achievement. I think Spielberg himself has said as much mentioning ET and Schlinder's List as the two films that defined him. But I would add Saving Private Ryan and Raiders of the Lost Ark to it and make it a bit more crowded.
            “Not the victory but the action. Not the goal but the game. In the deed the glory.”
            "All things are measured against Nebraska." falafel

            Comment

            • MartyFunkhouser
              Disciple of RNGesus
              • Nov 2008
              • 18720

              #21
              1994: Hoops Dreams. 1994 may actually be one of the worst years. I'm not exactly sure what I don't like about Forest Gump, but I really don't like the movie. Not only is the best movie of the year not nominated for best picture, it isn't even nominated for best documentary.
              As I lead this army, make room for mistakes and depression
              --Kendrick Lamar

              Comment

              • Color Me Badd Fan
                Senior Member
                • Jan 2009
                • 12519

                #22
                Originally posted by Paperback Writer View Post
                I'm familar with the AFI list. What is interesting is to compare the original AFI top 100 with the 10-year anniversary that you linked. On the original list, Dances with Wolves is #75 and Goodfellas is #94. That would seem to support your view of Dances with Wolves not aging well and Goodfellas holding on.

                Also on the original AFI rankings, Forrest Gump is #71, Pulp Fiction #95, and Shawshank Redemption is unranked. It's interesting how peoples' perceptions can change over time as a film is still the same. I don't understand it as I don't think my rankings would change all that much unless some of the lower ranked films fell off to make room for recent additions. I thought Blade Runner was excellent when it was released. So Shawshank Redemption gets a deserved ranking in the 10-year anniversity (and jumps Forrest Gump and Pulp Fiction in the process) but yet Dances with Wolves goes to the abyss of the unranked. Wonder if the AFI 20-year anniversity will put Dances with Wolves back on the rankings along with Oridnary People (A film I greatly enjoyed).

                Link to the original AFI list:
                http://connect.afi.com/site/DocServe....pdf?docID=264
                Blade Runner is a visually stunning film and it set a trend for how sci-fi films would look for decades after. Look at the Matrix and Minority Report (Minority Report less so). I can't believe that movie was made in 1982.

                2001 also amazed me. It had Star Wars special effects (albeit with no space dogfights) but came out 9 years earlier. The thing about Kubrick is that scenes he filmed in 68 (2001) and 71 (A Clockwork Orange) still look fresh today (if you can forgive the dated 70s furniture in A Clockwork Orange). The action/chase scenes in The French Connection don't hold up as well.
                Part of it is based on academic grounds. Among major conferences, the Pac-10 is the best academically, largely because of Stanford, Cal and UCLA. “Colorado is on a par with Oregon,” he said. “Utah isn’t even in the picture.”

                Comment

                • wuapinmon
                  Soul Plumber
                  • Dec 2008
                  • 30711

                  #23
                  I guess I'll be the first professor to note that you're judging the past with the benefit of hindsight and the perspective of years. Titanic won because it was the best movie at the time. Saul was king of Israel because he was the best person at the time.

                  David turned out to be a better king, William H. Macy turns out to be a far better choice than Cuba Gooding, Jr. in 1996, but we're forgetting what it was like to experience those films when the elation of "SHOW ME THE MONEY" was novel, and not hackneyed. His performance was amazing, though he has done precious little to merit Oscar attention since then.

                  To quote L.P. Hartley, "The past is a foreign country: they do things differently there."
                  "Wuap's "problem" is that he is smart & principled & committed to a moral course of action. His actions are supposed to reflect his ethical code.
                  The rest of us rarely bother to think about our actions." --Solon

                  Comment

                  • UtahDan
                    *
                    • Nov 2008
                    • 14496

                    #24
                    Originally posted by Jacob View Post
                    Make that Good Will Hunting instead of Titanic in 97

                    I agree with Saving Private Ryan in 98, but none of the others you listed.
                    Me too.

                    Comment

                    • Color Me Badd Fan
                      Senior Member
                      • Jan 2009
                      • 12519

                      #25
                      Originally posted by wuapinmon View Post
                      I guess I'll be the first professor to note that you're judging the past with the benefit of hindsight and the perspective of years. Titanic won because it was the best movie at the time. Saul was king of Israel because he was the best person at the time.

                      David turned out to be a better king, William H. Macy turns out to be a far better choice than Cuba Gooding, Jr. in 1996, but we're forgetting what it was like to experience those films when the elation of "SHOW ME THE MONEY" was novel, and not hackneyed. His performance was amazing, though he has done precious little to merit Oscar attention since then.

                      To quote L.P. Hartley, "The past is a foreign country: they do things differently there."
                      No shit, that's why the thread is titled "If the Academy had to do it over again."
                      Part of it is based on academic grounds. Among major conferences, the Pac-10 is the best academically, largely because of Stanford, Cal and UCLA. “Colorado is on a par with Oregon,” he said. “Utah isn’t even in the picture.”

                      Comment

                      • EuropeanFootballMale
                        Karate/Friendship Master
                        • Aug 2010
                        • 1339

                        #26
                        Life Is Beautiful should have won in 1998. SIL wasn't in the top 20 films made that year.

                        Comment

                        • Donuthole
                          Official Outgayer
                          • Nov 2008
                          • 25237

                          #27
                          Russell Crowe should have won in 01 for his role in A Beautiful Mind, but he'd just won the year before, so they gave it to Denzel instead. I love Training Day (one of my go-to movies) but Crowe got robbed.

                          Cuba Gooding Jr. should have won for Radio in 2003, but by then the trend of awarding for playing a handicap was passe.
                          Prepare to put mustard on those words, for you will soon be consuming them, along with this slice of humble pie that comes direct from the oven of shame set at gas mark “egg on your face”! -- Moss

                          There's three rules that I live by: never get less than twelve hours sleep; never play cards with a guy who's got the same first name as a city; and never go near a lady's got a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Now you stick to that, everything else is cream cheese. --Coach Finstock

                          Comment

                          • UtahDan
                            *
                            • Nov 2008
                            • 14496

                            #28
                            Originally posted by Donuthole View Post
                            Russell Crowe should have won in 01 for his role in A Beautiful Mind, but he'd just won the year before, so they gave it to Denzel instead. I love Training Day (one of my go-to movies) but Crowe got robbed.

                            Cuba Gooding Jr. should have won for Radio in 2003, but by then the trend of awarding for playing a handicap was passe.
                            I have always felt like Denzel Washington was flat out robbed when he did not win best actor in 1999 for his portrayal of Rubin Carter in The Hurricane (Kevin Spacey won for American Beauty) and that he in turn robbed Russell Crowe because the academy was making it up to him. I always thought his performance in Training Day was very ho hum.

                            But back on Kevin Spacey, do people feel like American Beauty and his performance have held up over the last ten years? To me that is a very forgettable movie and had some novelty at the time that has now worn off.

                            Comment

                            • Green Lantern
                              Has overcome great fear
                              • Aug 2009
                              • 2289

                              #29
                              Originally posted by Color Me Badd Fan View Post
                              The action/chase scenes in The French Connection don't hold up as well.
                              Whoa, I gotta object to that one! That movie holds up beautifully and the big car chase is just as brilliant today as it was 40 years ago. Which is probably because it was filmed using real cars, no special effects and a cameraman in the back seat wrapped in a mattress for protection.
                              Kids in general these days seem more socially retarded...

                              None of them date. They hang out. They text. They sit in the same car or room and don't say a word...they text. Then, they go home and whack off to internet porn.

                              I think that's the sad truth about why these kids are retards.

                              --Portland Ute

                              Comment

                              • wuapinmon
                                Soul Plumber
                                • Dec 2008
                                • 30711

                                #30
                                Originally posted by UtahDan View Post
                                But back on Kevin Spacey, do people feel like American Beauty and his performance have held up over the last ten years? To me that is a very forgettable movie and had some novelty at the time that has now worn off.
                                Alright, dammit. I'm only gonna say this once, because I defended this film on this site in late '09.

                                "Look at me, I'm masturbating in the shower, and the sad thing is, that's going to be the highlight of my day."

                                That's not a caricature......that's real suffering, real existential angst.

                                When Peter Gallagher tries to convince Annette Benning to run away with him and leave her husband, and she tells him no, he calls her "ordinary" and the look of hurt in her eyes, the quality of that moment in the script, for me, puts to rest any notion of ordinary. A stereotypical ham-fisted movie would've had Kevin Spacey do that Suvari girl and THEN find out she was a virgin up until that moment.

                                The dad wasn't closet gay. He had no relationship with his son, and he tried to experience that connection that he thought Kevin Spacey had shared with his son. There wasn't any repressed sexuality or over-compensation going on. When he gets rebuffed and realizes that his son is dealing drugs to this guy, then he gets homicidal because of some sense of righteous indignation that his orders were not followed; that this neighbor (Spacey) is the only thing preventing him from maintaining order and discipline. Not because he was a spurned lover, but because he's a trained killer inhabiting a system that he wasn't trained to handle, so he responds with the violence, ambush violence, that he has been trained to use to resolve conflict.

                                American Beauty is a farking masterpiece.


                                Originally posted by Color Me Badd Fan View Post
                                No shit, that's why the thread is titled "If the Academy had to do it over again."
                                CMBF, you ignorant slut. Re-read what I said. Even with your do-over, my comments carry the same relevance, the same import, and have the same power over your what-if.
                                "Wuap's "problem" is that he is smart & principled & committed to a moral course of action. His actions are supposed to reflect his ethical code.
                                The rest of us rarely bother to think about our actions." --Solon

                                Comment

                                Working...