$h#% Brian says in PMs...

[TripletDaddy]

If the plan is to run off the few remaining Utah fans, you guys are doing a pretty good job.

That IS the plan! and you are next!

[Shaka]

If the plan is to run off the few remaining Utah fans, you guys are doing a pretty good job.

.

I love it when a plan comes together!

[Commando]

If CJ is going to post PMs for all to see, he could at least include his replies, if any.

Looks like his failure to reply is a major source of burns for Brian.

[Commando]

Also- who are all these people PMing each other with ?

[TripletDaddy]

Also- who are all these people PMing each other with ?

1. Brian
2. LA Ute

I'm sensing a pattern already....

[cougjunkie]

He has always been an asshole and a ute, not that there is any difference.

[cougjunkie]

If the plan is to run off the few remaining Utah fans, you guys are doing a pretty good job.

If CJ is going to post PMs for all to see, he could at least include his replies, if any.

Never once replied to him. I have about 3 years worth of PMs. Do you want to see more?

[MartyFunkhouser]

FYI, this thread may be a violation of the CUF Privacy policy.

2. Divulging private information about another person without that person’s consent is strictly forbidden. This includes name, occupation, location, etc. This is also common sense and good manners. Do we really need to spell this out?

7. Private messages are private. There is no mechanism in the vBulletin software, even for the top-level administrator, to view someone else's private messages.

Perhaps the rule is only to let people know that PMs can't be read by people other than the recipient. We may need some clarification.

[Commando]

What private info are you talking about? Does cj really have a lot of scarves?

[MartyFunkhouser]

What private info are you talking about? Does cj really have a lot of scarves?

I'm just asking for clarification if PMs are allowed to be shared, not that I'm looking to share any. You have a rule that defines private messages as "private" and a rule that forbids disclosing private information. Again, asking for clarification.

[cougjunkie]

FYI, this thread may be a violation of the CUF Privacy policy.

2. Divulging private information about another person without that person’s consent is strictly forbidden. This includes name, occupation, location, etc. This is also common sense and good manners. Do we really need to spell this out?

7. Private messages are private. There is no mechanism in the vBulletin software, even for the top-level administrator, to view someone else's private messages.

Perhaps the rule is only to let people know that PMs can't be read by people other than the recipient. We may need some clarification.

I am assuming you posted #2 because you were anticipating the "Funks a shitty lawyer" posts

[Commando]

I'm just asking for clarification if PMs are allowed to be shared, not that I'm looking to share any. You have a rule that defines private messages as "private" and a rule that forbids disclosing private information. Again, asking for clarification.

If I'm in charge, I think it's pretty clear that common sense should prevail. Anything dumb like the stuff cj posted= whatever. Now if it's real life stuff, anything alluding to real life stuff, or- like you said- discloses private information, obviously should not be posted. If somebody PMs me to taunt me, chew me out, be an asshole, whatever-- I wouldn't think twice about disclosing that. It's shitty behavior, which I don't think has a right to privacy like your real life stuff, if that makes any sense. And FTR, I don't think anything cj disclosed in the PMs is any shittier than the stuff he posts for all to see, so there's that.

And I think anything related to profession, location, etc. that is disclosed in the course of the open message board is free game. Additional info disclosed in a PM should be kept there. This is all very obvious and common sense to most here. Therefore, I don't think there should be a uniform ban on PMs being shared, just private info in general.

[old_gregg]

FYI, this thread may be a violation of the CUF Privacy policy.

2. Divulging private information about another person without that person’s consent is strictly forbidden. This includes name, occupation, location, etc. This is also common sense and good manners. Do we really need to spell this out?

7. Private messages are private. There is no mechanism in the vBulletin software, even for the top-level administrator, to view someone else's private messages.

Perhaps the rule is only to let people know that PMs can't be read by people other than the recipient. We may need some clarification.

i don't think 7 means what you think it means. it just means mods can't read pms.

[YOhio]

If I'm in charge, I think it's pretty clear that common sense should prevail. Anything dumb like the stuff cj posted= whatever. Now if it's real life stuff, anything alluding to real life stuff, or- like you said- discloses private information, obviously should not be posted. If somebody PMs me to taunt me, chew me out, be an asshole, whatever-- I wouldn't think twice about disclosing that. It's shitty behavior, which I don't think has a right to privacy like your real life stuff, if that makes any sense. And FTR, I don't think anything cj disclosed in the PMs is any shittier than the stuff he posts for all to see, so there's that.

And I think anything related to profession, location, etc. that is disclosed in the course of the open message board is free game. Additional info disclosed in a PM should be kept there. This is all very obvious and common sense to most here. Therefore, I don't think there should be a uniform ban on PMs being shared, just private info in general.

Yes. If you make fun of Dave Rose for having cancer then you're an asshole who should have no expectation of privacy.

[Jeff Lebowski]

If I'm in charge, I think it's pretty clear that common sense should prevail. Anything dumb like the stuff cj posted= whatever. Now if it's real life stuff, anything alluding to real life stuff, or- like you said- discloses private information, obviously should not be posted. If somebody PMs me to taunt me, chew me out, be an asshole, whatever-- I wouldn't think twice about disclosing that. It's shitty behavior, which I don't think has a right to privacy like your real life stuff, if that makes any sense. And FTR, I don't think anything cj disclosed in the PMs is any shittier than the stuff he posts for all to see, so there's that.

And I think anything related to profession, location, etc. that is disclosed in the course of the open message board is free game. Additional info disclosed in a PM should be kept there. This is all very obvious and common sense to most here. Therefore, I don't think there should be a uniform ban on PMs being shared, just private info in general.

Bingo.

If someone sends three years worth of unsolicited bizarro PMs (none of which appear to disclose any personal, private information) without a single response, how can you argue that a reasonable expectation of privacy applies here? I got no time for this kind of drama.