If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I'm not sure about this first line - there's no word "vevor" in Latin. Maybe vivor? That's not much help either, as it's a passive form of "I live" (literally, "I am lived.") haud means "not at all", and hostilis (one L) is "hostile" or "enemy."
So, maybe it's supposed to read "vivat haud hostilis", which would mean "let no enemy live/survive!" as a jussive subjunctive. Even then, the word really should be "hostis" instead of hostilis (hostilis is an adjective).
My best guess is that it's supposed to be "versor haud hostilis", which means roughly " I am not at all hostile." (versor literally means "I am turned" but has connotations of being and existence)
Otherwise, you'll have to re-check the Latin or give me a reference. I'll check my massive dictionary at school tomorrow all the same.
My inclination is that it's crappy Latin or medieval or something, since there are more succinct ways to get the "I am not unfriendly" point across.
The second one is easier. It's on the back of the dollar bill. In proper Latin, it would read, "novus ordo saeculorum" but this an allusion to a line by Virgil the poet, (magnus . . . saeclorum nascitur ordo in Eclogue 4, line 5) who often syncopated words in order to fit meter.
Literally, it means "new order of the ages", or "a new order of generations" but there's a lot of nuance in there. It's often translated as "new world order" or something along those lines. It's supposed to refer to the dawning of a new era of hope and plenty without toils and labors heralded by the birth of a boy (nobody is sure to whom Virgil was referring, although many believe it was the expected son of Marc Antony & Octavia). Perhaps it was a tribute to Augustus, a close friend of Virgil's. It could just be allegorical as well. Certainly early Christians saw it as a prophecy of Jesus. (The Eclogues were published in about 38 BCE.)
Hope you don't mind I shared your answer in the fb group where this image came from.
Sent from my MB865 using Tapatalk 2
I don't mind you sharing it.
Knowing these are Danites, I wonder if they meant "vero haud hostilis", which would mean, "in truth, not at all inimical." That seems like it would work.
I'm glad it's just SuperGabers' leather jacket and not her biceps tattoo.
Knowing these are Danites, I wonder if they meant "vero haud hostilis", which would mean, "in truth, not at all inimical." That seems like it would work.
I'm glad it's just SuperGabers' leather jacket and not her biceps tattoo.
How embarrassing.
dunno, if they were attempting "let no enemy live/survive!" then that would work too.
Dio perdona tante cose per un’opera di misericordia
God forgives many things for an act of mercy
Alessandro Manzoni
Knock it off. This board has enough problems without a dose of middle-age lechery.
Comment