Originally posted by Art Vandelay
View Post
The math problem thread
Collapse
X
-
Pythagoras just shat his tunic.
-
Why would I waste a throw like that? I'd rather put one right in the face of the other guy and while he's stunned from the direct shot, immediately put another in his face and another and another and another, until he finally falls down.Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View PostMy turn to toss one out (so to speak):
All good snowball fighters know that a fun way to hit your opponent is to throw one snowball in a high arc with a dramatic windup. Then while he/she is distracted watching that snowball, you sneak in a second one on a more direct line.
Suppose you throw the first snowball at a velocity of 25.3 m/s and at an angle of 68.4 degrees. How many seconds should you wait after throwing the first one and what trajectory (angle) should you use on the second snowball, assuming it is thrown with the same velocity?"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy; its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." - Winston Churchill
"I only know what I hear on the news." - Dear Leader
Comment
-
I'll probably spend more time on the link at the bottom of that article:Originally posted by Art Vandelay View PostI've got and easy one for you math geeks. Solve: Ax + By = Cz. And oh btw, it is worth a cool million for you.
"I think it was King Benjamin who said 'you sorry ass shitbags who have no skills that the market values also have an obligation to have the attitude that if one day you do in fact win the PowerBall Lottery that you will then impart of your substance to those without.'"
- Goatnapper'96
Comment
-
Yeah, I know I'm late, but this was a welcome diversion. A computer would parse this as the expression tree below, then evaluate the expression tree with a depth first traversal. This tree is directly translated to reverse polish as "9 3 + 48 2 / *".Originally posted by woot View Post48/2(9+3) = ?
There is a single, unambiguous answer to this problem. However, it's been posted on several internet fora in the last couple days, and every time it becomes the subject of intense debate. Let's see if CUF can be the first to just get it right.
Code:* / \ + / / \ / \ 9 3 48 2
x20
Don't worry about people stealing your ideas. If your ideas are any good, you'll have to ram them down people's throats.
- Howard Aiken
Any sufficiently complicated platform contains an ad hoc, informally-specified, bug-ridden, slow implementation of half of a functional programming language.
- Variation on Greenspun's Tenth Rule
Comment
-
If I were doing on my HP48, I would doOriginally posted by lambdacoug View PostYeah, I know I'm late, but this was a welcome diversion. A computer would parse this as the expression tree below, then evaluate the expression tree with a depth first traversal. This tree is directly translated to reverse polish as "9 3 + 48 2 / *".
Code:* / \ + / / \ / \ 9 3 48 2
x20
48 2 / 9 3 + *"There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
"It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
"Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster
Comment
-
Yeah, the order of the left and right subtrees don't matter, but a compiler would parse the expression in the parentheses to be in the left subtree.Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View PostIf I were doing on my HP48, I would do
48 2 / 9 3 + *Don't worry about people stealing your ideas. If your ideas are any good, you'll have to ram them down people's throats.
- Howard Aiken
Any sufficiently complicated platform contains an ad hoc, informally-specified, bug-ridden, slow implementation of half of a functional programming language.
- Variation on Greenspun's Tenth Rule
Comment
Comment