Option 1: i5 7500, $200, 3.4 ghz, can "turbo boost" up to 3.8
Option 2: i5 7600, $220, 3.5 ghz, can boost up to 4.1
Option 3: i5 7600k, $242 (with $20 CPU Cooler), 3.8 ghz, without overclocking can boost up to 4.2. Can overclock, but don't plan to.
For basically $42, it seems like it makes sense to just buy the 7600k over the 7500 even if I don't plan on overclocking it, it's only $20 more to get the 7600k over the 7600. That said, does the speed difference between the 7500 and 7600 running at stock (3.4 vs. 3.8) matter very much at all, even in gaming? Are there other drawbacks to running the overclockable cpu simply at stock, more power consumption and more heat?
Option 2: i5 7600, $220, 3.5 ghz, can boost up to 4.1
Option 3: i5 7600k, $242 (with $20 CPU Cooler), 3.8 ghz, without overclocking can boost up to 4.2. Can overclock, but don't plan to.
For basically $42, it seems like it makes sense to just buy the 7600k over the 7500 even if I don't plan on overclocking it, it's only $20 more to get the 7600k over the 7600. That said, does the speed difference between the 7500 and 7600 running at stock (3.4 vs. 3.8) matter very much at all, even in gaming? Are there other drawbacks to running the overclockable cpu simply at stock, more power consumption and more heat?
Comment