RobinFinderson

[Rosebud]

Fixed.

lol.... he can't tell the difference between a woman's elbow and a woman's ankle. What do we learn from this?

FYI HFN, the crazy ankle avatar is a snub.... just in case you missed that, too.

[HuskyFreeNorthwest]

lol.... he can't tell the difference between a woman's elbow and a woman's ankle. What do we learn from this?

FYI HFN, the crazy ankle avatar is a snub.... just in case you missed that, too.

It looks a lot like an amputated elbow that someone tried to save part of the forearm by turning it into a hand.

What did you learn? I'd love to know.

What was the snub? I know for a while you had a crush on waup, did he shoot you down? Don't feel bad it isn't you personally he is just already in love with DDD.

[Shaka]

Robin,

I'm curious why you think lobbying in the open forum for your inclusion is a good idea considering doing so is violating the SE rules. I voted in your favor but these types of posts make me question whether or not I did the right thing.

[Drunk Tank]

How could Robin be violating SE rules when he is not a member?

Robin,

As I was not an active member on either Cougarguard or CougarBoard, I was not aware of your past. Thanks for posting what you did.

[Shaka]

How could Robin be violating SE rules when he is not a member?

Obviously he's not a member but that doesn't mean he shouldn't be subject to the rules. If I wanted to prove my worth to an organization I wouldn't prove it by blatantly violating their rules while trying to gain entry.

[Drunk Tank]

Obviously he's not a member but that doesn't mean he shouldn't be subject to the rules. If I wanted to prove my worth to an organization I wouldn't prove it by blatantly violating their rules while trying to gain entry.

While I agree with you in theory, how can someone be held to rules he has never been privy to? It is like a non-member being held accountable for violating the WOW. He may know what the WOW is, but he is not expected to follow it until he is a member.

[falafel]

While I agree with you in theory, how can someone be held to rules he has never been privy to? It is like a non-member being held accountable for violating the WOW. He may know what the WOW is, but he is not expected to follow it until he is a member.

What rule is he meant to have broken?

[Drunk Tank]

What rule is he meant to have broken?

I am not sure? Ask Shaka, he originally posted that he felt Robin was violating the SE rules. I assume its the what happens in the SE stays in the SE rule.

Also, I dont feel like Robin was "campaigning" for entrance as much as he was trying to set the record straight about his past.

[smokymountainrain]

I am not sure? Ask Shaka, he originally posted that he felt Robin was violating the SE rules. I assume its the what happens in the SE stays in the SE rule.

Also, I dont feel like Robin was "campaigning" for entrance as much as he was trying to set the record straight about his past.

Yep.

[falafel]

Yep.

Although I think Robin would agree he's campaigned in the past.

And, I think his recent post (Hi Robin!) was in fact a campaign stump. I don't have any problem with that though.

[Coach McGuirk]

Dear Robin. I voted no. Much like Junk, it has nothing to do with you. I think the last time I voted yes for anyone was some time back in September. You will get in though, I can see it.


Also, can I violate the SE rules by disclosing my own vote? Uh oh.

[smokymountainrain]

Although I think Robin would agree he's campaigned in the past.

And, I think his recent post (Hi Robin!) was in fact a campaign stump. I don't have any problem with that though.

It was most likely a little of both. But I certainly understood it to be mostly him setting the record straight than a campaign stump. In fact, I didn't see it as a campaign stump at all, but I will concede that it could have been that in part.

[RobinFinderson]

Although I think Robin would agree he's campaigned in the past.

And, I think his recent post (Hi Robin!) was in fact a campaign stump. I don't have any problem with that though.

I didn't even know that there was a rule against campaigning. For what it is worth, I waited until after the process was over in order to not appear to be trying to manipulate the outcome. As for what happens six months down the road (or whenever), I figured that the questions that I answered for some in private might also be questions that others have, so I put that info out there.

[falafel]

It was most likely a little of both. But I certainly understood it to be mostly him setting the record straight than a campaign stump. In fact, I didn't see it as a campaign stump at all, but I will concede that it could have been that in part.

I agree, it was both.

Robin, we have successfully divined the intention of your post. No need to respond.

[smokymountainrain]

Dear Robin. I voted no. Much like Junk, it has nothing to do with you. I think the last time I voted yes for anyone was some time back in September. You will get in though, I can see it.


Also, can I violate the SE rules by disclosing my own vote? Uh oh.

Next UFC fight at junkie's place...I'm kicking both your asses. At the same time, if you guys so choose.