In November the NYT reviewed Frank Gehry's AGO building in Toronto, Canada. This is significant for me because I developed most of the parametric computer models for every feature element in the building. These models, imo, represent the technical design of the building. In other words, Frank would design the building as the primary author. He would then need 3D experts to solve how his forms could be actually built. The design would ultimately change a bit, due to the physical limitations of real-world materials. I was the person tasked with solving these problems for this building during the design phase, when all of the critical issues were resolved. Thought Frank gets all of the credit (c'est la vie) I still feel a great sense of authorship in this project. Here are some images of my work:

The front facade was primarily a paneling exercise where I had to figure out how to bend glass planes to conform to this shape without bending them too far.

The glass is extra clear (no greenish blue tint) which is cool, but expensive.

I built the models for that little cork screw on the back of the building. I'm not too thrilled with the big box.

And the models for this 'feature stair.'

The front facade is the best part, and developing the modeling process for that was all my design. Ain't I special?

The front facade was primarily a paneling exercise where I had to figure out how to bend glass planes to conform to this shape without bending them too far.

The glass is extra clear (no greenish blue tint) which is cool, but expensive.

I built the models for that little cork screw on the back of the building. I'm not too thrilled with the big box.

And the models for this 'feature stair.'

The front facade is the best part, and developing the modeling process for that was all my design. Ain't I special?

Comment