Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Don't Fear the Fork: BYU vs. ASU

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by USUC View Post
    The Big-XII needs to get officiating in synch this off season.
    Mark Harlan AGREES. LOL!

    Comment


    • #92
      Originally posted by USUC View Post

      Heckler's veto. The Big-XII needs to get officiating in synch this off season. Calls in game for play will always be hard. But the aggression and discipline of coaches, players, and fans in between plays needs to get under control and quick. Shedeur Sanders pushed a ref in the back on Saturday. Stuff like that and the ASU stuff needs to be brought under control.
      Agreed. It's possible the officiating crew decided against the penalty because of how unhinged the ASU coach was. That should be MORE reason to throw the flag not, less.

      Comment


      • #93
        I honestly wondered if them not throwing a flag or two was more about a possible riot rather than just being chill. I think the intentional grounding would be a no-brainer but they didn't have the guts to call it.

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by Shaka View Post
          I honestly wondered if them not throwing a flag or two was more about a possible riot rather than just being chill. I think the intentional grounding would be a no-brainer but they didn't have the guts to call it.
          I understand there is a subjective element to the grounding penalty that likely isn't met here. Here is the text of the rule:

          I. Quarterback who is not outside the tackle box, and is attempting to save yardage, intentionally throws a desperation forward pass that falls incomplete where there is no eligible receiver. Ruling: Intentional Grounding. Penalty: Loss of down at the spot of the foul. The clock starts at the snap.
          Here, the throw was not an attempt to save yardage or time-- it was to kill time. Given that, the subjective element may not be there and the no call is probably correct.
          τὸν ἥλιον ἀνατέλλοντα πλείονες ἢ δυόμενον προσκυνοῦσιν

          Comment


          • #95
            Originally posted by All-American View Post

            I understand there is a subjective element to the grounding penalty that likely isn't met here. Here is the text of the rule:



            Here, the throw was not an attempt to save yardage or time-- it was to kill time. Given that, the subjective element may not be there and the no call is probably correct.
            Disagree. He could go backwards and run around to kill time, but that risks losing yardage. The very purpose of the throw is to run clock without the risk of losing yardage, ie is an attempt to save yardage.
            Prepare to put mustard on those words, for you will soon be consuming them, along with this slice of humble pie that comes direct from the oven of shame set at gas mark “egg on your face”! -- Moss

            There's three rules that I live by: never get less than twelve hours sleep; never play cards with a guy who's got the same first name as a city; and never go near a lady's got a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Now you stick to that, everything else is cream cheese. --Coach Finstock

            Comment


            • #96
              Originally posted by Donuthole View Post

              Disagree. He could go backwards and run around to kill time, but that risks losing yardage. The very purpose of the throw is to run clock without the risk of losing yardage, ie is an attempt to save yardage.
              Correct. There is no exception in the rule if your intent is to run the clock. You are not allowed to throw the ball clearly away from eligible receivers while inside the tackle box. This was textbook intentional grounding. I would argue it also fits within the spirit of the rule as the forward pass is only allowed under strict requirements for both the receiver and the thrower. It is not meant to be used to waste time outside those restrictions.

              Comment


              • #97
                Originally posted by Omaha 680 View Post

                Correct. There is no exception in the rule if your intent is to run the clock. You are not allowed to throw the ball clearly away from eligible receivers while inside the tackle box. This was textbook intentional grounding. I would argue it also fits within the spirit of the rule as the forward pass is only allowed under strict requirements for both the receiver and the thrower. It is not meant to be used to waste time outside those restrictions.
                Now I'm remembering; wasn't Jake flagged (after much deliberation) for intentional grounding earlier in the game when he intentionally sailed a pass over a sideline route from the tackle box, but put it in about the 20th row? If that was deemed intentional grounding by the crew, what Leavitt did on the second to last play of the game was certainly grounding.

                Comment


                • #98
                  Originally posted by Omaha 680 View Post

                  Now I'm remembering; wasn't Jake flagged (after much deliberation) for intentional grounding earlier in the game when he intentionally sailed a pass over a sideline route from the tackle box, but put it in about the 20th row? If that was deemed intentional grounding by the crew, what Leavitt did on the second to last play of the game was certainly grounding.
                  I remember a play like that from the Kansas game.

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Originally posted by Bo Diddley View Post

                    I remember a play like that from the Kansas game.
                    Ok I may be conflating our two recent huge embarrassing first half performances.

                    Edit: actually no. I attended the KU game in person and didn't watch it after and i remember the tv rules analyst defending this particular grounding call so it had to be ASU.

                    Comment


                    • I don't see any grounding penalties in either game.

                      Arizona State 28-23 BYU (Nov 23, 2024) Play-by-Play - ESPN

                      Kansas 17-13 BYU (Nov 16, 2024) Play-by-Play - ESPN

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by beefytee View Post
                        Must have been another game I was watching then.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by beefytee View Post
                          I'm going crazy I guess.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Omaha 680 View Post

                            I'm going crazy I guess.
                            I swear I saw the same thing. He passed it to his right. It went past the sticks, but up in the stands. Could have been another QB in another game I guess.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Bo Diddley View Post

                              I swear I saw the same thing. He passed it to his right. It went past the sticks, but up in the stands. Could have been another QB in another game I guess.
                              It happened to Utah in the Iowa St game. But I sincerely hope you didn’t waste your time watching that abomination.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by chrisrenrut View Post

                                It happened to Utah in the Iowa St game. But I sincerely hope you didn’t waste your time watching that abomination.
                                I think I might have tuned in for the last couple of minutes.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X