Originally posted by Omaha 680
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
OFFICIAL 2026 US/Canada/Mexico World Cup Thread
Collapse
X
-
Refs are losing control"There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
"It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
"Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster
-
Wow. That game was a blast."There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
"It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
"Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster
Comment
-
"There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
"It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
"Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster
Comment
-
That was my first reaction, but thinking about it, the offensive player kicked the ball out of bounds and had no chance of getting to it if he had stayed up. At least that was how I saw it. So it's not a goal scoring opportunity. It is still a foul but I'm ok without the red card.Originally posted by Omaha 680 View Post
I think that red card was 100x more justified than the Balogun card and I can live with it. What I dont understand is not showing a red to the Mexico keeper and also this latest VAR review that awarded Mexico a penalty.
Is love to see another angle on it like the ref cam to make a better informed decision.
Comment
-
Ok, I looked at the laws of the game. No red was the right decision but he should have got a yellow. Here is what it says:
"Where a player commits an offence against an opponent within their own penalty area which denies an opponent an obvious goal-scoring opportunity and the referee awards a penalty kick, the offender is cautioned if the offence was an attempt to play the ball or a challenge for the ball;"
Because he made an attempt to play the ball, there can be no red if a penalty kick is awarded. a yellow was appropriate.
Comment
-
The Belgians acting so desperate to play us without one of our best players is hilarious. Wankers."There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
"It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
"Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster
Comment
-
Trump's supposed involvement muddies everything as usual. Trump and FIFA are made for each other. Gross.Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View PostThe Belgians acting so desperate to play us without one of our best players is hilarious. Wankers.
While the red card was ridiculous on its face and the suspension was the just decision, I hate so much that the world will paint it as the US President bullying FIFA into the decision. I can't decide if I want Balogun to score 5 goals or be a non-factor in a decisive win. Either way the Belgians will claim they were cheated.
Comment
-
I thought it would be a different hemispherical divide, but man this looks dumb.Originally posted by Omaha 680 View Post
Bumping this gem from page one of the thread. falafel wasn't that far off with his prediction in 2018.
KH-GRAPHIC-2030-WORLD-CUP-HOSTS-V2.jpgAin't it like most people, I'm no different. We love to talk on things we don't know about.
Dig your own grave, and save!
"The only one of us who is so significant that Jeff owes us something simply because he decided to grace us with his presence is falafel." -- All-American
"I know that you are one of the cool and 'edgy' BYU fans" -- Wally
GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!
Comment
-
The multi-nation hosting is going to be a necessity going forward given the size of the field and FIFA WC stadium capacity requirements (unless you are Qatar or Saudi Arabia and lie about what you will deliver). I don't mind the Portugal/Spain/Morrocco hosting. Adding the three extra matches in South America is stupid.Originally posted by falafel View Post
I thought it would be a different hemispherical divide, but man this looks dumb.
KH-GRAPHIC-2030-WORLD-CUP-HOSTS-V2.jpg
June in Buenos Aires is mild with average nighttime low temperatures in the mid-40s. However it absolutely can get very cold there occasionally in June. It would be hilarious if the Argentina match was below freezing at kickoff.
Comment
-
It is crazy, because it puts south america and africa out of the running to host and almost guarantees that the US will host again in 2038.
if your confederation hosts you ineligible to host for 2 cycles.- UEFA: Union of European Football Associations (Europe) - 2030
- CONMEBOL: Confederación Sudamericana de Fútbol (South America) - 2030
- CONCACAF: Confederation of North, Central America and Caribbean Association Football (North & Central America) 2026
- CAF: Confédération Africaine de Football (Africa) - 2030
- AFC: Asian Football Confederation (Asia and Australia) - 2034 - Saudi Arabia are hosts
- OFC: Oceania Football Confederation (New Zealand and Pacific Island nations) - they only have 1 stadium that meets standards
Comment
-
I don't mind the main Cup being between those 3 countries. A lot closer than LA to NY, or Toronto to Mexico City. But I don't see any reason for the 3 opening games in S.A. Will all 6 of those teams be granted automatic berths? 4 of the 6 are likely to be there no matter what, but Paraguay's last cup before this year was 2010.Originally posted by Omaha 680 View Post
The multi-nation hosting is going to be a necessity going forward given the size of the field and FIFA WC stadium capacity requirements (unless you are Qatar or Saudi Arabia and lie about what you will deliver). I don't mind the Portugal/Spain/Morrocco hosting. Adding the three extra matches in South America is stupid.Ain't it like most people, I'm no different. We love to talk on things we don't know about.
Dig your own grave, and save!
"The only one of us who is so significant that Jeff owes us something simply because he decided to grace us with his presence is falafel." -- All-American
"I know that you are one of the cool and 'edgy' BYU fans" -- Wally
GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!
Comment
-
I haven't read anything for sure, but I can't imagine the three South American countries will be autobids. But maybe they have to be? Could they swap out one of the opening matches for another South American country if Paraguay (or Uruguay) don't qualify? I think switching one match location would be relatively easy with the several months lead time they would have after conclusion of CONMEBOL qualifying. Also with the expanded field, it is really hard to not qualify now. Chile and Italy should be extra embarassed at not being at this year's tournment.Originally posted by falafel View Post
I don't mind the main Cup being between those 3 countries. A lot closer than LA to NY, or Toronto to Mexico City. But I don't see any reason for the 3 opening games in S.A. Will all 6 of those teams be granted automatic berths? 4 of the 6 are likely to be there no matter what, but Paraguay's last cup before this year was 2010.
Maybe in the end they will rig the qualifying so a couple of the extra bids that typically are playoffs between federations just go to CONMEBOL.
Comment
-
We should host every other cycle. Just alternate hemispheres.Originally posted by BigPiney View PostIt is crazy, because it puts south america and africa out of the running to host and almost guarantees that the US will host again in 2038.
"There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
"It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
"Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster
Comment
Comment