Originally posted by BlueK
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
2020 Post-Election Thread...let's talk about it
Collapse
X
-
Apparently Chris Christie is on board ... which is saying something (he was one of the first Republicans to endorse Trump in the 2016 election).
https://twitter.com/mtracey/status/1...211119104?s=20
Comment
-
Comment
-
I don't think I would agree with impeachment or invoking the 25th, based on what we know now.
I have a really high standard for what would be sufficient to remove the sitting president-- maybe too high. But I greatly fear what happens when we put this card into play. It may be well and good to use it now, but history tells us that the next time it will be invoked it will be for less cause. I strongly suspect that when later historians read about the fall of the American Republic, a prominent feature of that process will be the removal, whether by impeachment or other means, of a sitting president who (along with his supporters) felt the removal was without basis and refused to respect it. I just don't want to go there if it can be helped.
And here, I don't think we need to go there. From the day after the election, when I saw Biden overtake Trump in the Michigan vote count, I have had zero doubt as to whether Joe Biden would be president on January 21. Even now, as Trump protests the vote and claims to have been wronged, he says there will be a peaceful transition of power. Were there any doubt on this point, I would consider impeachment and/or 25th amendment processes more seriously. As the only practical consequence of either process will be to accomplish what will happen in two weeks anyway, I'd rather we didn't.τὸν ἥλιον ἀνατέλλοντα πλείονες ἢ δυόμενον προσκυνοῦσιν
Comment
-
Originally posted by All-American View PostI don't think I would agree with impeachment or invoking the 25th, based on what we know now.
I have a really high standard for what would be sufficient to remove the sitting president-- maybe too high. But I greatly fear what happens when we put this card into play. It may be well and good to use it now, but history tells us that the next time it will be invoked it will be for less cause. I strongly suspect that when later historians read about the fall of the American Republic, a prominent feature of that process will be the removal, whether by impeachment or other means, of a sitting president who (along with his supporters) felt the removal was without basis and refused to respect it. I just don't want to go there if it can be helped.
And here, I don't think we need to go there. From the day after the election, when I saw Biden overtake Trump in the Michigan vote count, I have had zero doubt as to whether Joe Biden would be president on January 21. Even now, as Trump protests the vote and claims to have been wronged, he says there will be a peaceful transition of power. Were there any doubt on this point, I would consider impeachment and/or 25th amendment processes more seriously. As the only practical consequence of either process will be to accomplish what will happen in two weeks anyway, I'd rather we didn't.
Comment
-
Originally posted by All-American View PostI don't think I would agree with impeachment or invoking the 25th, based on what we know now.
I have a really high standard for what would be sufficient to remove the sitting president-- maybe too high. But I greatly fear what happens when we put this card into play. It may be well and good to use it now, but history tells us that the next time it will be invoked it will be for less cause. I strongly suspect that when later historians read about the fall of the American Republic, a prominent feature of that process will be the removal, whether by impeachment or other means, of a sitting president who (along with his supporters) felt the removal was without basis and refused to respect it. I just don't want to go there if it can be helped.
And here, I don't think we need to go there. From the day after the election, when I saw Biden overtake Trump in the Michigan vote count, I have had zero doubt as to whether Joe Biden would be president on January 21. Even now, as Trump protests the vote and claims to have been wronged, he says there will be a peaceful transition of power. Were there any doubt on this point, I would consider impeachment and/or 25th amendment processes more seriously. As the only practical consequence of either process will be to accomplish what will happen in two weeks anyway, I'd rather we didn't.
Comment
-
Originally posted by All-American View PostI don't think I would agree with impeachment or invoking the 25th, based on what we know now.
I have a really high standard for what would be sufficient to remove the sitting president-- maybe too high. But I greatly fear what happens when we put this card into play. It may be well and good to use it now, but history tells us that the next time it will be invoked it will be for less cause. I strongly suspect that when later historians read about the fall of the American Republic, a prominent feature of that process will be the removal, whether by impeachment or other means, of a sitting president who (along with his supporters) felt the removal was without basis and refused to respect it. I just don't want to go there if it can be helped.
And here, I don't think we need to go there. From the day after the election, when I saw Biden overtake Trump in the Michigan vote count, I have had zero doubt as to whether Joe Biden would be president on January 21. Even now, as Trump protests the vote and claims to have been wronged, he says there will be a peaceful transition of power. Were there any doubt on this point, I would consider impeachment and/or 25th amendment processes more seriously. As the only practical consequence of either process will be to accomplish what will happen in two weeks anyway, I'd rather we didn't.
Look at the last week:
Hundreds of falsehoods
Coercion of at least one election official to change the results of an election
Held a 2 day rally in the front yard of the White House full of propaganda
Participated in said rally and told his supporters you can’t take back our country with weakness
Told attendees to march on the capitol
When those same people attempted to breach the seat of government and he didn’t tell them to stop
After they breached the capitol and he didn’t tell them to stop
After they vandalized and ransacked the capitol and he called them great people and patriots
That’s not enough for you to say you’ve seen enough?
Trump was right, you would watch him shoot someone and look the other way.
Comment
-
Originally posted by YOhio View Post"...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
"You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
- SeattleUte
Comment
Comment