2020 General Presidential Election Thread

[falafel]

What in the hell are you talking about, man? You are not a very good student of my posts. I know it requires a little reading but the dumb Dems admitted to stuffing the ballot boxes.

Do you have a link from an actual news source?

[Uncle Ted]

Do you have a link from an actual news source?

Oh, you mean other than CNN, MSNBC, etc...

Here is fox news: https://www.foxnews.com/us/philadelp...te-vote-counts

[falafel]

Oh, you mean other than CNN, MSNBC, etc...

Here is fox news: https://www.foxnews.com/us/philadelp...te-vote-counts

So ONE dude admitted to taking bribes? That's "Dems" admitting to widespread stuffing of the ballot? No wonder Trump wasn't able to come up with any signing evidence.

[Commando]

What? Believe that Bloomberg is paying for votes? Don't you read the news, man? The Florida AG is calling for an investigation.

lol a totally non-politically motivated investigation after Bloomberg is paying fines so that people can vote any way they like. That fine is basically a poll tax, so FL can F itself.

[Uncle Ted]

lol a totally non-politically motivated investigation after Bloomberg is paying fines so that people can vote any way they like. That fine is basically a poll tax, so FL can F itself.

Bloomberg is only paying the fines for Dems (aka, felons).

Yeah, they need to hurry up and fill RBG's seat with another conservative judge and send this to the supreme court to sort out. The senate needs to hurry on this because Feinstein is not getting any younger and her husband may be going to jail.

[LVAllen]

Bloomberg is only paying the fines for Dems (aka, felons).

Yeah, they need to hurry up and fill RBG's seat with another conservative judge and send this to the supreme court to sort out. The senate needs to hurry on this because Feinstein is not getting any younger and her husband may be going to jail.

I can see why "only Democrats can be felons" would be an essential belief for a supporter of President Temp.

[falafel]

Bloomberg is only paying the fines for Dems (aka, felons).

Yeah, they need to hurry up and fill RBG's seat with another conservative judge and send this to the supreme court to sort out. The senate needs to hurry on this because Feinstein is not getting any younger and her husband may be going to jail.

Where's the link that shows that Bloomberg is requiring evidence of party affiliation before paying a felon's fines? I'm sure you've got a link for that Ted. And if you don't, you'll just link something else and pretend that it says whatever you want it to say.

[Commando]

Bloomberg is only paying the fines for Dems (aka, felons).

Yeah, they need to hurry up and fill RBG's seat with another conservative judge and send this to the supreme court to sort out. The senate needs to hurry on this because Feinstein is not getting any younger and her husband may be going to jail.

Can you distinguish this from a voter registration drive? I'm sure you must have proof that people are specifically being paid to vote for a certain candidate if that's what you are accusing Bloomberg of doing...

[wapiti]

That's not the question. The question wasn't 'would you concede a tightly contested election?' The question was 'will you commit to a peaceful transferral of power?'

His response was 'sure if we get rid of the ballots (wtf) there will be no transferral of power and I'll just continue...'

Just curious, did anyone ever ask Obama or Bush the same question? It's a ridiculous question and I'm not surprised Trump trolled with his response.

[Northwestcoug]

Where's the link that shows that Bloomberg is requiring evidence of party affiliation before paying a felon's fines? I'm sure you've got a link for that Ted. And if you don't, you'll just link something else and pretend that it says whatever you want it to say.

Falafel falling into the same trap as PAC. Ted is not interested in serious political discourse. The content of his links are meaningless. They are the fake libertarian way of convincing us both sides are equally bad.

[falafel]

Falafel falling into the same trap as PAC. Ted is not interested in serious political discourse. The content of his links are meaningless. They are the fake libertarian way of convincing us both sides are equally bad.

BOTH sides are bad? I guessed I missed that part of Ted's schtick!

[Northwestcoug]

Just curious, did anyone ever ask Obama or Bush the same question? It's a ridiculous question and I'm not surprised Trump trolled with his response.

It’s a ridiculous question for serious leaders. But it’s an entirely legitimate question for Trump after he has repeatedly called the upcoming election fraudulent.

[Northwestcoug]

BOTH sides are bad? I guessed I missed that part of Ted's schtick!

Well, that’s the other part of his shtick. Trying to convince us he isn’t in the tank for Trump.

[Moliere]

Has the left promised to be peaceful in the event that Trump wins the election? I mean, he won in 2016 and many democrat politicians still think he’s an illegitimate president.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Now who’s the dean?]

Just curious, did anyone ever ask Obama or Bush the same question? It's a ridiculous question and I'm not surprised Trump trolled with his response.

They didn’t have to ask Obama or Bush the same question. But you know that.