Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Las Vegas Strip - Deadliest Mass Shooting in US

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by creekster View Post
    You are so annoyingly patronizing and so smug and self-satisfied that you are almost singlehandedly making this board not worth it for me. You and your ilk are exactly why Trump won. Do you have anything worthwhile to say here? Or do you just prefer to parade your self-assessed vastly superior morality and intelligence while leaving nothing of substance or worth on the table?
    Good gracias, Old Gregg is not why Trump won. His ilk didn’t vote for him. He didn’t single-handedly turn GOP voters into morons last election season.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Crockett View Post
      It's funny that all of these liberals / progressives that screech Trump is the next Hitler are now so willing to give up their 2d amendment rights. If Trump were truly a budding tyrant, then they should be more supportive than ever of the 2d amendment. And don't forget, the Nazis came to power, reviewed the gun registration logs and began confiscating firearms, particularly from the Jews and political enemies / enemies of the state. Authoritarian governments prefer defenseless, pacified populaces. So much easier to control.
      What are the citizens going to do? Outshoot the Army?

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Crockett View Post
        It's funny that all of these liberals / progressives that screech Trump is the next Hitler are now so willing to give up their 2d amendment rights. If Trump were truly a budding tyrant, then they should be more supportive than ever of the 2d amendment. And don't forget, the Nazis came to power, reviewed the gun registration logs and began confiscating firearms, particularly from the Jews and political enemies / enemies of the state. Authoritarian governments prefer defenseless, pacified populaces. So much easier to control.
        Let me go on the record and say that I have no problem with liberals/progressives giving up their 2nd amendment rights.
        "If there is one thing I am, it's always right." -Ted Nugent.
        "I honestly believe saying someone is a smart lawyer is damning with faint praise. The smartest people become engineers and scientists." -SU.
        "Yet I still see wisdom in that which Uncle Ted posts." -creek.
        GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!

        Comment


        • Originally posted by New Mexican Disaster View Post
          What are the citizens going to do? Outshoot the Army?
          "If there is one thing I am, it's always right." -Ted Nugent.
          "I honestly believe saying someone is a smart lawyer is damning with faint praise. The smartest people become engineers and scientists." -SU.
          "Yet I still see wisdom in that which Uncle Ted posts." -creek.
          GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!

          Comment


          • Originally posted by frank ryan View Post
            Good gracias, Old Gregg is not why Trump won. His ilk didn’t vote for him. He didn’t single-handedly turn GOP voters into morons last election season.
            Gaping assholes like Ol Posturer caused Trump to win in the same way the Versailles Treaty allowed Hitler to come to power. The Germans still allowed it to happen.
            Part of it is based on academic grounds. Among major conferences, the Pac-10 is the best academically, largely because of Stanford, Cal and UCLA. “Colorado is on a par with Oregon,” he said. “Utah isn’t even in the picture.”

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Crockett View Post
              Oh, that reminds me. I do not want to hear any moral preening, lecturing, or shaming about gun rights (a real right) from anyone who supports abortion (a fake right).
              LOL. If you read my moral preening about guns, you also read the words of an abortion supporter! Feel free to put me on ignore.
              "...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
              "You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
              - SeattleUte

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post
                That was a good read. Congressman Gowdy also made this point (starting around the 2:30 mark):



                We already have controls on what kind of guns you can have, where you can have them, when you can use them and what individuals can possess even a single bullet. So the question to me is whether or not current controls are adequate and there are two fundamental questions that you should put your finger on: What law had it existed at the time would have prevented this mass killing or another mass killing. What law, but for its lack of implementation could have prevented this. That's one question. The other question is, among all the panoply of current gun laws, how are we doing enfocing them?
                He also mentions that looking at the DOJ statistics for the number of gun laws already on the books:

                I was really underwhelmed at the level of prosecution over the last eight years.
                "If there is one thing I am, it's always right." -Ted Nugent.
                "I honestly believe saying someone is a smart lawyer is damning with faint praise. The smartest people become engineers and scientists." -SU.
                "Yet I still see wisdom in that which Uncle Ted posts." -creek.
                GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Northwestcoug View Post
                  LOL. If you read my moral preening about guns, you also read the words of an abortion supporter! Feel free to put me on ignore.
                  I had the Jimmy Kimmels and Lady Gagas ("blood on your hands") of the world in mind when I wrote that. Even though you are inconsistent about wanting to protect innocent life, I didn't notice you morally preening about it.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by PaloAltoCougar View Post
                    Very nicely done, Solon. I often wonder about the "well-regulated militia" introductory clause. If I were a member of the National Guard (which I presume is the only regulated militia currently, but someone please correct me on this), I would be required to use whatever weapons my commanding officers dictated, and that I wouldn't be allowed to provide my own weaponry.
                    You are correct--the National Guard is the regulated militia. You are also correct that the commander dictates what weapons their soldiers can use. There is a provision for the commander to allow personal weapons, but I've never seen that allowed. The National Guard derives its lineage from the Minutemen who used their own weapons.

                    Originally posted by New Mexican Disaster View Post
                    What are the citizens going to do? Outshoot the Army?
                    One of the great things about each state having a militia is that it provides a check against the power of the federal standing army. In the National Guard, citizens are the Army.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Color Me Badd Fan View Post
                      Gaping assholes like Ol Posturer caused Trump to win in the same way the Versailles Treaty allowed Hitler to come to power. The Germans still allowed it to happen.
                      very confusing analogy bro
                      Te Occidere Possunt Sed Te Edere Non Possunt Nefas Est.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by beefytee View Post
                        Is this the kind of statistic you are looking for?

                        https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/05/o...ion-columnists
                        Interesting. Thanks

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Topper View Post
                          As we become more and more urban, the regulators may eventually win. Although a high number of firearms exist, the percentage of persons acquiring them is declining. Once that percentage declines significantly, the regulators will win. For them, Lady Liberty is just a mascot.
                          Urbanization will be what turns the tide on the 2nd amendment. Currently, the electoral college gives the rural a larger voice to fight the concentrated urban political power. But there will be a tipping point. The Supreme Court has essentially ruled that the 2nd amendment provides individuals the right to bear arms. It is an individual right. This is as established as Roe v Wade.

                          I do wonder what percentage of gun control advocates really desire to do away with the 2nd amendment. I'm sure plenty fail to realize that the biggest obstacle they have with "common sense gun laws" is the constitution. You cannot take away the rights of a citizen. Maybe with enough urbanization, they can repeal the 2nd amendment. All it takes is 2/3 of congress and a POTUS with the desire to get rid of it. Then have the legislatures of 38 states ratify it. Not in my lifetime.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by USUC View Post
                            Urbanization will be what turns the tide on the 2nd amendment. Currently, the electoral college gives the rural a larger voice to fight the concentrated urban political power. But there will be a tipping point. The Supreme Court has essentially ruled that the 2nd amendment provides individuals the right to bear arms. It is an individual right. This is as established as Roe v Wade.

                            I do wonder what percentage of gun control advocates really desire to do away with the 2nd amendment. I'm sure plenty fail to realize that the biggest obstacle they have with "common sense gun laws" is the constitution. You cannot take away the rights of a citizen. Maybe with enough urbanization, they can repeal the 2nd amendment. All it takes is 2/3 of congress and a POTUS with the desire to get rid of it. Then have the legislatures of 38 states ratify it. Not in my lifetime.
                            It's the Koch brothers/GOP crowd that want to have a constitutional convention.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by frank ryan View Post
                              It's the Koch brothers/GOP crowd that want to have a constitutional convention.
                              A constitutional convention for what? Abortion?

                              Comment


                              • CNN interviews the shooter's haircutter from GreatClips!

                                Last haircut there was two months ago! More to come!
                                Give 'em Hell, Cougars!!!

                                For all this His anger is not turned away, but His hand is stretched out still.

                                Not long ago an obituary appeared in the Salt Lake Tribune that said the recently departed had "died doing what he enjoyed most—watching BYU lose."

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X