Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

NASA data shows that warming models are skewed / screwed

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • NASA data shows that warming models are skewed / screwed

    And now we know why the atmosphere hasn't warmed in over a decade

    http://news.yahoo.com/nasa-data-blow...192334971.html
    Ute-ī sunt fīmī differtī

    It can't all be wedding cake.

  • #2
    That article needed to say alarmist a few more times to really make the message hit home.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by oxcoug View Post
      And now we know why the atmosphere hasn't warmed in over a decade

      http://news.yahoo.com/nasa-data-blow...192334971.html
      I don't care what the hell NASA is saying now. This Texas summer has made me a believer in global warming. Al Gore, you win.
      "If there is one thing I am, it's always right." -Ted Nugent.
      "I honestly believe saying someone is a smart lawyer is damning with faint praise. The smartest people become engineers and scientists." -SU.
      "Yet I still see wisdom in that which Uncle Ted posts." -creek.
      GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by oxcoug View Post
        And now we know why the atmosphere hasn't warmed in over a decade

        http://news.yahoo.com/nasa-data-blow...192334971.html
        Why do you think information like this never makes the evening news?

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by oxcoug View Post
          And now we know why the atmosphere hasn't warmed in over a decade

          http://news.yahoo.com/nasa-data-blow...192334971.html
          While that article is in line with my general thinking (I don't trust the accuracy of the computer models), I had to double check that it was from Forbes because it reads like anti-global warming fanfic.

          Alarmist.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Uncle Ted View Post
            I don't care what the hell NASA is saying now. This Texas summer has made me a believer in global warming. Al Gore, you win.
            Amen!

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by DapperDan View Post
              While that article is in line with my general thinking (I don't trust the accuracy of the computer models), I had to double check that it was from Forbes because it reads like anti-global warming fanfic.

              Alarmist.
              Actually to be fair - it is, as I just verified. The guy who wrote it for Forbes is at the Heartland Institute which is dedicated to warring against AGW hype and generates plenty of its own hype as a result.

              That said - the research article is in a peer reviewed journal. I'd like to get my hands on that.
              Ute-ī sunt fīmī differtī

              It can't all be wedding cake.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by SCcoug View Post
                That article needed to say alarmist a few more times to really make the message hit home.
                There were 562 words in that article. Alarmist was only in their 14 times. That is only 2.5% of the words! The word "the" was in there way more times.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Uncle Ted View Post
                  I don't care what the hell NASA is saying now. This Texas summer has made me a believer in global warming. Al Gore, you win.


                  It was 85 degrees in Houston yesterday at around 7pm. I'm now worried about global cooling....
                  "Discipleship is not a spectator sport. We cannot expect to experience the blessing of faith by standing inactive on the sidelines any more than we can experience the benefits of health by sitting on a sofa watching sporting events on television and giving advice to the athletes. And yet for some, “spectator discipleship” is a preferred if not primary way of worshipping." -Pres. Uchtdorf

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by oxcoug View Post
                    Actually to be fair - it is, as I just verified. The guy who wrote it for Forbes is at the Heartland Institute which is dedicated to warring against AGW hype and generates plenty of its own hype as a result.

                    That said - the research article is in a peer reviewed journal. I'd like to get my hands on that.
                    Yes, I noticed this, too. Also, it's in one of the pansiest "peer-reviewed" journals out there. Authors get to select their own peer reviewers, and it's not even a real journal. They don't publish in print at all. You can get the article free from: http://www.mdpi.com/journal/remotesensing.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Babs View Post
                      Yes, I noticed this, too. Also, it's in one of the pansiest "peer-reviewed" journals out there. Authors get to select their own peer reviewers, and it's not even a real journal. They don't publish in print at all. You can get the article free from: http://www.mdpi.com/journal/remotesensing.


                      There is a huge variation in quality and rigor in the "peer-reviewed" world.
                      "There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
                      "It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
                      "Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post
                        There is a huge variation in quality and rigor in the "peer-reviewed" world.
                        I had no idea there were journals for which the authors could select their own review. How creative.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I was watching TV the other night and to make sure I get a fair and balanced input, I watched a portion of the Cris Mathews show. Cris as you know is a long time and well respected journalist.

                          He was asking a guy if he really could back tea partiers. A group (tea partiers) who ignore scientific facts such as evolution and man made global warming.

                          As one who is not convinced there is man made global warming, it shook me to the core that I am so stupid as to not accept scientific fact.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Babs View Post
                            I had no idea there were journals for which the authors could select their own review. How creative.
                            Yeah pretty funny. But still as if not more rigorous than the UN IPCC review process.
                            Ute-ī sunt fīmī differtī

                            It can't all be wedding cake.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Moliere View Post


                              It was 85 degrees in Houston yesterday at around 7pm. I'm now worried about global cooling....
                              Indeed. Houston's summer has been downright pleasant this year. I don't know what Ted and Babs are talking about.
                              Awesomeness now has a name. Let me introduce myself.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X