Originally posted by creekster
View Post
PG&E’s Big Blackout Is Only the Beginning
[...]
The Wall Street Journal detailed in April how PG&E intended to use the outages, known as public safety power shut-offs, to reduce wildfire risk, a strategy that carries consequences for medically vulnerable populations who rely on electric devices to survive, and businesses that could lose customers and inventory.
Such outages are unlikely to end soon because utilities are liable under California law for wildfire damage caused by their equipment, even if they aren’t negligent. That makes fires a serious threat to drive the companies into insolvency.
[...]
“We must have zero risk of a spark,” said PG&E Chief Executive Bill Johnson. “We will very likely have to make this kind of decision again in the future.”
[...]
[...]
The Wall Street Journal detailed in April how PG&E intended to use the outages, known as public safety power shut-offs, to reduce wildfire risk, a strategy that carries consequences for medically vulnerable populations who rely on electric devices to survive, and businesses that could lose customers and inventory.
Such outages are unlikely to end soon because utilities are liable under California law for wildfire damage caused by their equipment, even if they aren’t negligent. That makes fires a serious threat to drive the companies into insolvency.
[...]
“We must have zero risk of a spark,” said PG&E Chief Executive Bill Johnson. “We will very likely have to make this kind of decision again in the future.”
[...]
Comment