A Profound Question (for active Mormons only)

[DU Ute]

Viking is my new hero! :clap: Now, go and get tooblue to partake.

[wuapinmon]

Whoa.

[wuapinmon]

Viking is my new hero! :clap: Now, go and get tooblue to partake.

BOOOOOOO. tooblue and I disagree on almost everything, and we probably wouldn't get along in real life, but he's never ever ever ever like SloanHater was.

[Blueintheface]

Now what am going to do this offseason?

[Jeff Lebowski]

Moliere had an admirable quip. It was enough. Then Viking had to wreck it with heavy handed explanation.

Viking has done what had not seemed possible--make Sloanhater sympathetic.

Yes. While I support creekster's decision given the long history of this kind of reaction from SH, Viking was way out of line and I have told him so.

[EuropeanFootballMale]

Also, go **** yourself you arrogant piece of ****...

I've got to say given the target it's hard to argue with the sentiment. Maybe SH should have just claimed a security breach or something.

[Viking]

Wow. SH, who is certainly lurking here, I'm serious: please get help.

There's really no scenario in which a gentle jab (SU's being opportunistic here and Robin needs to stop camping at Sherwood Park in protest of the 1% and realize he's in the 1%) should have escalated into what happened.

It's been years and my entrance onto this board came at a very difficult time for me, which oozed onto these "pages" in the form of a lot more vitriol than should ever be appropriate but come on, try to imagine writing what was written...I simply can't come up with a scenario where I would have ever written the Creekster response. Responding to me they way he did was my es-pe-she-all-i-tee for longer than I want to admit on this place, but I was still smarting from some very devastating personal issues that, for their part, are no justification, but they are part of an explanation of poor comportment here.

SH, something's wrong and it can be fixed. You should definitely do so and I'm sure you can. Please do it and come back with some of the good stuff.

I apologize to the board for being a part of making this a less hospitable place.

[TripletDaddy]

I think Viking should be banned, as well.

[Pelado]

Maybe, but daring a mod to ban you after being warned is not the right way to respond.

It wasn't a warning.

We dont give warnings here. So dont count this as one

[fusnik]

Wow. SH, who is certainly lurking here, I'm serious: please get help.

There's really no scenario in which a gentle jab (SU's being opportunistic here and Robin needs to stop camping at Sherwood Park in protest of the 1% and realize he's in the 1%) should have escalated into what happened.

It's been years and my entrance onto this board came at a very difficult time for me, which oozed onto these "pages" in the form of a lot more vitriol than should ever be appropriate but come on, try to imagine writing what was written...I simply can't come up with a scenario where I would have ever written the Creekster response. Responding to me they way he did was my es-pe-she-all-i-tee for longer than I want to admit on this place, but I was still smarting from some very devastating personal issues that, for their part, are no justification, but they are part of an explanation of poor comportment here.

SH, something's wrong and it can be fixed. You should definitely do so and I'm sure you can. Please do it and come back with some of the good stuff.

I apologize to the board for being a part of making this a less hospitable place.

What you posted was far worse.

Creek, why didn't you rebut and ban this joker?

[Non Sequitur]

What you posted was far worse.

Creek, why didn't you rebut and ban this joker?

How ironic. The dick calling the prick black.

[UtahDan]

How ironic. The dick calling the prick black.

That was a bro code ruling. Show some respect.

[Jacob]

I have no problem with SH being banned. They guy has contributed nothing and is a jerk. But has he been banned simply for telling someone to f off? Waup said the same thing to me the other day. I think it is always uncalled for, but that's just me. If SH is to be banned, it should not be for what is almost a daily occurrence on this board.

[TripletDaddy]

I have no problem with SH being banned. They guy has contributed nothing and is a jerk.

[fusnik]

That was a bro code ruling. Show some respect.

Isn't there a thread where you could be bitching about the church?

And FTR bro code was ox's pet not mine.