Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ensign Peak Advisors

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • imagine if the church invested a few billion a year, less than they earn per year on this thing, in utah

    Comment


    • My take. The church knew what it was doing (meaning trying to hide the details of the fund). They are using the lawyers as an excuse. The church doesn’t spend enough on charity (IMO) but they spend a lot and a lot more than they are given credit for. You can’t fix many problems by throwing money at them (sorry democrats, but it’s true) and church knows this. You need to change behavior and culture and generations of thought to fix poverty and other ills of the world. Give a man a fish…
      "Discipleship is not a spectator sport. We cannot expect to experience the blessing of faith by standing inactive on the sidelines any more than we can experience the benefits of health by sitting on a sofa watching sporting events on television and giving advice to the athletes. And yet for some, “spectator discipleship” is a preferred if not primary way of worshipping." -Pres. Uchtdorf

      Comment


      • Originally posted by All-American View Post
        That was a very strange newsroom article.

        Did anyone have BLOX and House of the Lord on their LDS temple bingo card?
        "...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
        "You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
        - SeattleUte

        Comment


        • Originally posted by BigPiney View Post

          You wanted a temple for a trailer park?
          It's a step up from a "trailer park" temple... I am sure they take the wheels off before putting it up on blocks.
          "If there is one thing I am, it's always right." -Ted Nugent.
          "I honestly believe saying someone is a smart lawyer is damning with faint praise. The smartest people become engineers and scientists." -SU.
          "Yet I still see wisdom in that which Uncle Ted posts." -creek.
          GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Moliere View Post
            My take. The church knew what it was doing (meaning trying to hide the details of the fund). They are using the lawyers as an excuse. The church doesn’t spend enough on charity (IMO) but they spend a lot and a lot more than they are given credit for. You can’t fix many problems by throwing money at them (sorry democrats, but it’s true) and church knows this. You need to change behavior and culture and generations of thought to fix poverty and other ills of the world. Give a man a fish…
            Amen.

            Today's version of "Give a man a fish": Give a man/woman/(or one of the other 79 gender identities) an Obama/Biden phone and they can make calls to their "Bros"/"Sis's"/etc for a day or so until they drop it into the mud puddle... Teach them to be an engineer and they can make their own damn phone or at least have an enough money (before taxes) to maybe buy one of those nice iPhones. Especially if they are one of those welding engineers like JL.
            "If there is one thing I am, it's always right." -Ted Nugent.
            "I honestly believe saying someone is a smart lawyer is damning with faint praise. The smartest people become engineers and scientists." -SU.
            "Yet I still see wisdom in that which Uncle Ted posts." -creek.
            GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Northwestcoug View Post

              That was a very strange newsroom article.

              Did anyone have BLOX and House of the Lord on their LDS temple bingo card?
              I thought it was interesting.
              τὸν ἥλιον ἀνατέλλοντα πλείονες ἢ δυόμενον προσκυνοῦσιν

              Comment


              • Originally posted by All-American View Post

                I thought it was interesting.
                Yes it was. But just the way it was written and the inferences it was making were unexpected. Did anyone see modular design and building for temples coming? And those pictures were interesting. Are they 3D printing?



                "...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
                "You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
                - SeattleUte

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Moliere View Post

                  The model seems to be working too well…
                  Well he is a professor of law, so he should probably stay in his lane!

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by tooblue View Post

                    They shall know them by their fruits. It's an easy measure to test. If there were leaders enriching themselves at the top levels of the church then I could understand that level of cynicism. Problem is that is not what is happening. There is no evidence to support innuendo or assumptions. In contrast, as you say the church does so much good—of which you are aware. But you weren't aware of LDS social services, so what else is the church doing of which you and I are not aware?

                    Consider for a moment that we have a couple who moved into our Ward roughly eight months ago. The husband is Russian, the wife Ukrainian. They have two children. They fled the war. They both served missions in Siberia. They met several years ago at a YSA conference in Moscow. The same things, like YSA and Youth conferences, happen all over the world just like they do in North America. That's incredible to contemplate.

                    My wife and I have close friends in Europe. The husband is German, the wife is Spanish. She speaks Spanish, French, German and English. She works for LDS social services and primarily works with missionaries struggling with mental health, not just in Europe but in Africa. That's also incredible to contemplate.

                    I have told the story many times, but my neighbor who lives directly behind me is originally from Africa. He is a truck driver which was also his vocation in Africa. When he found out we were members of the church he praised the church's incredible welfare program. He talks about how he personally delivered food and goods for the church to Bishop Storehouses in Africa. He knew the network and how the program works.

                    Again, that is incredible to contemplate. The shear size and reach of the church, and its ability to fund itself, and care for members in every community across the globe. But hey, supposedly no one knows what the church is doing with its funds And how can you possibly say "it could do a lot more" when you are not even fully aware of what is already being done?

                    Just because the leaders don't appear to be getting rich doesn't make them good stewards. Btw no one is saying they aren't doing ANY charitable work. It's evident they are doing some. It's the scale that bothers people. Additionally yes, even people who don't even give to the church should have a say and the reason is because:

                    1. They church doesn't pay taxes.
                    2. The charitable donations that are given lower the taxes of the people giving them (thus lowering the tax base)

                    Thus they should have to have to prove their social value.

                    Pursuant to all this
                    I've long said that one of the main problems of the church is that its filled with "yes" men. They would probably benefit from an ombudsman. Someone not affiliated that can give them good advice about how their decisions are perceived
                    "Be a philosopher. A man can compromise to gain a point. It has become apparent that a man can, within limits, follow his inclinations within the arms of the Church if he does so discreetly." - The Walking Drum

                    "And here’s what life comes down to—not how many years you live, but how many of those years are filled with bullshit that doesn’t amount to anything to satisfy the requirements of some dickhead you’ll never get the pleasure of punching in the face." – Adam Carolla

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Mormon Red Death View Post

                      Just because the leaders don't appear to be getting rich doesn't make them good stewards. Btw no one is saying they aren't doing ANY charitable work. It's evident they are doing some. It's the scale that bothers people. Additionally yes, even people who don't even give to the church should have a say and the reason is because:

                      1. They church doesn't pay taxes.
                      2. The charitable donations that are given lower the taxes of the people giving them (thus lowering the tax base)

                      Thus they should have to have to prove their social value.

                      Pursuant to all this
                      I've long said that one of the main problems of the church is that its filled with "yes" men. They would probably benefit from an ombudsman. Someone not affiliated that can give them good advice about how their decisions are perceived
                      Just curious--what proportion of tithing and donations do you suppose is itemized? What proportion comes from the US?

                      Comment


                      • Desnews runs an editorial:

                        https://www.deseret.com/2023/5/15/23...on-mormons-inc

                        Admittedly, I struggle with wrapping my head around money. What does $50 Billion mean? I used to manage $1 Billion in Army assets. At some point money doesn't even mean anything anymore. That's likely a function of working for the federal government for so many years.

                        Anyway, I always assumed the Church had the means to take care of all the upkeep of real assets world-wide.

                        An earlier clarification by the church still applies today. Despite its many investments and strong financial position today, “the bulk of the church’s assets are money-consuming assets, rather than money-producing.” Tens of thousands of houses of worship, temples, missions, genealogical centers and universities all take money to operate.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by tooblue View Post

                          So, your bias is saying the non religious schools they trained at are terrible? Bullsh**
                          What? I have no clue what you are saying here. I think you are trying to find offense and/or a complaint about religion where none is intended.

                          I said that they are not equipped to handle court involved therapy and they are not. They do not have the skills and training for it. For example, I'm not sure any of them are involved with the AFCC and are AFCC informed. To be fair, a lot of therapists are not equipped to handle court involved therapy and high conflict divorce dynamics.
                          As I lead this army, make room for mistakes and depression
                          --Kendrick Lamar

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Mormon Red Death View Post

                            Just because the leaders don't appear to be getting rich doesn't make them good stewards. Btw no one is saying they aren't doing ANY charitable work. It's evident they are doing some. It's the scale that bothers people. Additionally yes, even people who don't even give to the church should have a say and the reason is because:

                            1. They church doesn't pay taxes.
                            2. The charitable donations that are given lower the taxes of the people giving them (thus lowering the tax base)

                            Thus they should have to have to prove their social value.

                            Pursuant to all this
                            I've long said that one of the main problems of the church is that it’s filled with "yes" men. They would probably benefit from an ombudsman. Someone not affiliated that can give them good advice about how their decisions are perceived
                            Haha. Yes. Let’s hire the SLTrib comment section to coach the church on spending and public perception.
                            "There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
                            "It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
                            "Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Bo Diddley View Post

                              Just curious--what proportion of tithing and donations do you suppose is itemized? What proportion comes from the US?
                              Given how top-heavy income is these days, I think it is fair to assume that most tithing revenue comes from wealthier members.
                              τὸν ἥλιον ἀνατέλλοντα πλείονες ἢ δυόμενον προσκυνοῦσιν

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Mormon Red Death View Post

                                Just because the leaders don't appear to be getting rich doesn't make them good stewards. Btw no one is saying they aren't doing ANY charitable work. It's evident they are doing some. It's the scale that bothers people. Additionally yes, even people who don't even give to the church should have a say and the reason is because:

                                1. They church doesn't pay taxes.
                                2. The charitable donations that are given lower the taxes of the people giving them (thus lowering the tax base)

                                Thus they should have to have to prove their social value.

                                Pursuant to all this
                                I've long said that one of the main problems of the church is that its filled with "yes" men. They would probably benefit from an ombudsman. Someone not affiliated that can give them good advice about how their decisions are perceived
                                I find the bolded part problematic.
                                τὸν ἥλιον ἀνατέλλοντα πλείονες ἢ δυόμενον προσκυνοῦσιν

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X