Don't give me any of this "they are equal companions that form one gospel" crap.
I want to hear some arguments for how one is superior to the other.
For example, I would argue that the BOM is vastly superior to the Bible as a cover-to-cover read. There are definitely some super boring stretches in the BOM, but that's nothing compared to much of the Bible. The Bible is too long, and at least the BOM has some nice continuous themes, even if it's a bit repetitive.
I would also give a slight edge to the BOM in the "war stories" and "last of the mohicans-imitation" categories.
I want to hear some arguments for how one is superior to the other.
For example, I would argue that the BOM is vastly superior to the Bible as a cover-to-cover read. There are definitely some super boring stretches in the BOM, but that's nothing compared to much of the Bible. The Bible is too long, and at least the BOM has some nice continuous themes, even if it's a bit repetitive.
I would also give a slight edge to the BOM in the "war stories" and "last of the mohicans-imitation" categories.
Comment