Originally posted by jay santos
View Post
Jay, let's suppose for the sake of argument that your conspiracy theory is true. I.e., this was not a move to promote Oaks, but rather a move to demote DFU. Do we have any hard evidence (or even soft evidence!) that there is some kind of idealogical/theological rift in the Q12 regarding DFU? Yes, he gives beautiful, inspiring talks, but is there any evidence that he was a force driving or resisting policy change in certain areas?
Comment