That was a much better debate. The expectations for Trump were not to throw tantrums, so he did ‘well’. He did have a few good retorts. Biden had low expectations as well, thanks to Trump’s ridiculous strategy. He didn’t drool over himself, so he won.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
2020 General Presidential Election Thread
Collapse
X
-
"...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
"You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
- SeattleUte
-
Does Biden not know about the internet? He’s absolutely in record saying he’ll ban fracking. That’s not disputable at all. Now he’s changed that stance and depending on where he campaigns he either talks about only banning fracking in federal lands or he denies he’s ban it.
Biden seemed a bit slower tonight and Trump was more respectful (very low bar). It’ll be interesting to see what happens after this but a lot of people have already voted so it might not matter anyway."Discipleship is not a spectator sport. We cannot expect to experience the blessing of faith by standing inactive on the sidelines any more than we can experience the benefits of health by sitting on a sofa watching sporting events on television and giving advice to the athletes. And yet for some, “spectator discipleship” is a preferred if not primary way of worshipping." -Pres. Uchtdorf
Comment
-
2020 General Presidential Election Thread
Originally posted by falafel View PostBecause Trump keeps going over his allotted time.
This was more tolerable all around.
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkLast edited by dabrockster; 10-22-2020, 08:10 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Moliere View PostDoes Biden not know about the internet? He’s absolutely in record saying he’ll ban fracking. That’s not disputable at all. Now he’s changed that stance and depending on where he campaigns he either talks about only banning fracking in federal lands or he denies he’s ban it.
Biden seemed a bit slower tonight and Trump was more respectful (very low bar). It’ll be interesting to see what happens after this but a lot of people have already voted so it might not matter anyway.
Maybe ABC gave Trump the debate questions???
[Insert crooked Repubs picture and/or link here]Ain't it like most people, I'm no different. We love to talk on things we don't know about.
"The only one of us who is so significant that Jeff owes us something simply because he decided to grace us with his presence is falafel." -- All-American
GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!
Comment
-
2020 General Presidential Election Thread
Originally posted by old_gregg View Postyou are definitely the dumbest person on this or any other byu chat blog and it is not close. truly shocking that they let you drive a car.
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkLast edited by dabrockster; 10-22-2020, 08:25 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Moliere View PostDoes Biden not know about the internet? He’s absolutely in record saying he’ll ban fracking. That’s not disputable at all. Now he’s changed that stance and depending on where he campaigns he either talks about only banning fracking in federal lands or he denies he’s ban it.
Biden seemed a bit slower tonight and Trump was more respectful (very low bar). It’ll be interesting to see what happens after this but a lot of people have already voted so it might not matter anyway."If there is one thing I am, it's always right." -Ted Nugent.
"I honestly believe saying someone is a smart lawyer is damning with faint praise. The smartest people become engineers and scientists." -SU.
"Yet I still see wisdom in that which Uncle Ted posts." -creek.
GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!
Comment
-
Originally posted by falafel View PostTrump also seemed much more prepared tonight and had obvious talking points.
Maybe ABC gave Trump the debate questions???
[Insert crooked Repubs picture and/or link here]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Comment
-
Originally posted by falafel View PostWind kills all the birds. [emoji28]"If there is one thing I am, it's always right." -Ted Nugent.
"I honestly believe saying someone is a smart lawyer is damning with faint praise. The smartest people become engineers and scientists." -SU.
"Yet I still see wisdom in that which Uncle Ted posts." -creek.
GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Uncle Ted View PostYes, wind turbines do kill birds but so do cats... I wouldn't mind getting rid of cats, however.Ain't it like most people, I'm no different. We love to talk on things we don't know about.
"The only one of us who is so significant that Jeff owes us something simply because he decided to grace us with his presence is falafel." -- All-American
GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!
Comment
-
Originally posted by All-American View PostIncluding chickens? And turkeys?
... I guess that means brisket for thanksgiving after all. Oh well.Ain't it like most people, I'm no different. We love to talk on things we don't know about.
"The only one of us who is so significant that Jeff owes us something simply because he decided to grace us with his presence is falafel." -- All-American
GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!
Comment
-
Ted's reference to cats was correct, although cats are a tad more lethal than wind turbines. Cats are believed to kill 2-4 Billion birds a year. Another billion or so die by flying into windows. Wind turbines kill somewhere between 200K and 500K birds a year. Cell towers kill at least 10x as many birds as do wind turbines. Why Trump keeps bringing up turbine bird kills is baffling. But then, Trump...
Comment
-
Originally posted by PaloAltoCougar View PostTed's reference to cats was correct, although cats are a tad more lethal than wind turbines. Cats are believed to kill 2-4 Billion birds a year. Another billion or so die by flying into windows. Wind turbines kill somewhere between 200K and 500K birds a year. Cell towers kill at least 10x as many birds as do wind turbines. Why Trump keeps bringing up turbine bird kills is baffling. But then, Trump...When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.
--Jonathan Swift
Comment
-
Originally posted by SeattleUte View PostThe problem with wind is that it can't replace fossil fuels. Note the rolling blackouts in California this year.
Comment
-
Originally posted by PaloAltoCougar View PostYeah, my post suggests I'm a big fan of wind power, but I'm not. Given my druthers, we would have been far more aggressive with nuclear over the past 10-20 years.
E.g., http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-d...racist-historyLast edited by SeattleUte; 10-22-2020, 10:28 PM.When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.
--Jonathan Swift
Comment
Comment