Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
2018 College Football Thread
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by SCcoug View PostI thought Goldilocks said OU had no defense, so it shouldn't matter.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Green Monstah View PostI think it's a good hire for Tech, but there's no guarantee. Scott Frost took a winless team and turned them undeafeated in one year, then coached the worst Nebraska team in decades the year after that.Last edited by Paperback Writer; 11-29-2018, 10:20 PM.“Not the victory but the action. Not the goal but the game. In the deed the glory.”
"All things are measured against Nebraska." falafel
Comment
-
Originally posted by Babs View PostLast time we played Goldilocks, we had a not-very-good DC (that we hired at the expense of Clemson’s Brent Venables) who nevertheless made halftime adjustments to allow our offense to score 21 unanswered and nearly win a come-from-behind victory for OU. He was fired for the effort. Since then, the defense has been, as ESPN puts it, “positively dreadful,” and apparently no one will take the DC job.I'm like LeBron James.
-mpfunk
Comment
-
Originally posted by smokymountainrain View Posti've always viewed lincoln riley as one of, if not the top young coach in college football. beast to work for? otherwise, i can't figure out why nobody wants the job. you come in, turn that defense around - i mean, it isn't as if you can't recruit great athletes to norman - you're a hero, you probably win a national title along the way and you have your pick of HC jobs after a couple years.
1. You've got a first-year university president who has no experience of any kind in academia, much less in academic administration, but who recognizes this is the biggest decision he'll make for years.
2. The natives (i.e., the donors) are extremely restless and undoubtedly will only settle for the best of the best. I'm guessing the candidates they're pushing are also being considered for head coaching vacancies.
3. We need someone that can recruit from Texas east through South Carolina. That basically means someone out of the SEC or ACC, who would have to leave the prestige of those two conferences to move to the big 12 and try to overcome air-raid offense every week. (UCF is undefeated but has its own set of defensive issues.)
4. In some ways Lincoln's youth and demeanor work against him. He's so young that most of the coaches OU would be recruiting are significantly older than he is. And he's about as enthusiastic as a guy headed into a proctology exam. I can't imagine him generating any excitement regarding the prospect of a fifty-year-old relocating his family to the middle of Oklahoma to work for a guy fifteen years his junior following a decade of widely publicized systemic dysfunction.
5. It's well known in the community that the sitting AD was stupid enough to fire Venables to bring on Mike Stoops. Who would want that risk?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Babs View PostI think there are a ton of issues:
1. You've got a first-year university president who has no experience of any kind in academia, much less in academic administration, but who recognizes this is the biggest decision he'll make for years.
2. The natives (i.e., the donors) are extremely restless and undoubtedly will only settle for the best of the best. I'm guessing the candidates they're pushing are also being considered for head coaching vacancies.
3. We need someone that can recruit from Texas east through South Carolina. That basically means someone out of the SEC or ACC, who would have to leave the prestige of those two conferences to move to the big 12 and try to overcome air-raid offense every week. (UCF is undefeated but has its own set of defensive issues.)
4. In some ways Lincoln's youth and demeanor work against him. He's so young that most of the coaches OU would be recruiting are significantly older than he is. And he's about as enthusiastic as a guy headed into a proctology exam. I can't imagine him generating any excitement regarding the prospect of a fifty-year-old relocating his family to the middle of Oklahoma to work for a guy fifteen years his junior following a decade of widely publicized systemic dysfunction.
5. It's well known in the community that the sitting AD was stupid enough to fire Venables to bring on Mike Stoops. Who would want that risk?I'm like LeBron James.
-mpfunk
Comment
-
Originally posted by Babs View PostI think there are a ton of issues:
1. You've got a first-year university president who has no experience of any kind in academia, much less in academic administration, but who recognizes this is the biggest decision he'll make for years.
2. The natives (i.e., the donors) are extremely restless and undoubtedly will only settle for the best of the best. I'm guessing the candidates they're pushing are also being considered for head coaching vacancies.
3. We need someone that can recruit from Texas east through South Carolina. That basically means someone out of the SEC or ACC, who would have to leave the prestige of those two conferences to move to the big 12 and try to overcome air-raid offense every week. (UCF is undefeated but has its own set of defensive issues.)
4. In some ways Lincoln's youth and demeanor work against him. He's so young that most of the coaches OU would be recruiting are significantly older than he is. And he's about as enthusiastic as a guy headed into a proctology exam. I can't imagine him generating any excitement regarding the prospect of a fifty-year-old relocating his family to the middle of Oklahoma to work for a guy fifteen years his junior following a decade of widely publicized systemic dysfunction.
5. It's well known in the community that the sitting AD was stupid enough to fire Venables to bring on Mike Stoops. Who would want that risk?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Applejack View PostNo enthusiasm for the Pac-12 CHAMPIONSHIP game?
Nationally there seems to be little interest in the game because it's a match-up between two 3-loss teams from relatively low-population states.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Applejack View PostNo enthusiasm for the Pac-12 CHAMPIONSHIP game?
It might be nice to honor Triplet (RIP) with a thread title like, "The Bundy Bowl: Who Will be the Pac-12's (Serial) Killer?"Te Occidere Possunt Sed Te Edere Non Possunt Nefas Est.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Omaha 680 View PostNot necessarily. If it is possible to quantify the importance of those issues in weight, and they average 400 pounds each, it would indeed be a ton of issues.
Originally posted by old_gregg View Postfrig off, pac has already delivered this sports chat blog’s official position on the ideal outcome of that horrid contest
Comment
-
Early reaction from the Texas Tech fans that I know (and I know more than anyone else on this board) is that they are not really excited about the Matt Wells hire."Discipleship is not a spectator sport. We cannot expect to experience the blessing of faith by standing inactive on the sidelines any more than we can experience the benefits of health by sitting on a sofa watching sporting events on television and giving advice to the athletes. And yet for some, “spectator discipleship” is a preferred if not primary way of worshipping." -Pres. Uchtdorf
Comment
Comment