Impeaching Trump: Make America Sane Again

[Uncle Ted]

Biden, one of the longest tenured senators in the U.S., isn't fit for office? Gee, that's a new one.

LOL... yeah, Biden has been getting into arguments with Iowa voters, calling them fat and damn liars, and challenging them to pushups:

Embedded Tweet

Biden: "Look the reason I'm running is because I've been around a long time and I know more than most people know. I can get things done, that's why I'm running. If you want to check my shape let's do pushups here man let's run (audience claps). #2 No one has said my son has done anything wrong and I did not on any occasion and no one has ever said it."
Guy: "I didn't say you were doing anything wrong."
Biden: "You said I set up my son to work at an oil company, isn't that what you said. Get your words straight, Jack!"
Guy: "I heard that on MSNBC"
Biden: (interrupting) "YOU DON'T HEAR THAT ON MSNBC, YOU DIDN'T HEAR THAT AT ALL. WHAT YOU HEARD --- LOOK, I'm not gonna get into an argument with you man."
Guy: "Well I don't want to..."
Biden: "well, yeah you do! but look fat --- look here's the deal. here's the deal --"
Guy: "Look man, you don't have anymore backbone than Trump does --"
Audience boos.
Biden: "Any other questions?"

No wonder Biden is slipping in the polls. I hope he stays in for a while, however. This is great entertainment.

[Uncle Ted]

What the hell Dems?.. First they dropped "Quid Pro Quo" and now they dropped "Bribery"! These impeachment articles are totally weak sauce:

Democrats Abandon Poll-Tested ‘Bribery’ In Articles Of Impeachment Against Trump

After repeatedly using the term “bribery” to sell the inquiry against President Donald Trump, House Democrats appear to have abandoned it in the articles of impeachment filed Tuesday.

Not even 24 hours after the last public hearing on the impeachment inquiry, the House Judiciary Committee announced two articles of impeachment: one accusing the president of “abuse of power” and the other charging him with “obstruction of Congress.”
[...]

https://dailycaller.com/2019/12/10/d...s-impeachment/

So the Dems in congress now want to impeach Drumpf because he hurt their feelings... What a bunch of snowflakes. If you are going to do it, Dems, then do it right. They need add quid pro quo, bribery, and stampeding cattle (through The Vatican) to articles and stop being wimps.

[Commando]

lol you support Trump.

[falafel]

What the hell Dems?.. First they dropped "Quid Pro Quo" and now they dropped "Bribery"! These impeachment articles are totally weak sauce:


https://dailycaller.com/2019/12/10/d...s-impeachment/

So the Dems in congress now want to impeach Drumpf because he hurt their feelings... What a bunch of snowflakes. If you are going to do it, Dems, then do it right. They need add quid pro quo, bribery, and stampeding cattle (through The Vatican) to articles and stop being wimps.

The article is from the Daily Caller.

Ignore.

[Flystripper]

The article is from the Daily Caller.

Ignore.

he can't

[falafel]

he can't

Oh, you're right. Someone will need to write a script and update his programming. Unfortunately, I don't know how.

[Uncle Ted]

Oh, you're right. Someone will need to write a script and update his programming. Unfortunately, I don't know how.

You should learn to code! This is what the Dems are telling everyone:

Embedded Tweet

I approve of this message. We already have too many damn lawyers and PolySci's.

[Uncle Ted]

The article is from the Daily Caller.

Ignore.

How about Salon?

William Barr claims that Barack Obama posed the “greatest danger" to democracy in 2016 — not Russia

Attorney General William Barr claimed in an NBC News interview that former President Barack Obama posed the “greatest danger” to democracy in the 2016 election — not Russia.

Barr told the network that he disagreed with his own department’s inspector general report, which concluded that the FBI did not “spy” on the Trump campaign and was justified in launching an investigation into its ties to Russia.

Nonetheless, the attorney general claimed that the Obama administration posed the biggest threat to democracy because of alleged spying, which was debunked Monday by the release of the report.

“I think, probably, from a civil liberties standpoint, the greatest danger to our free system is that the incumbent government used the apparatus of the state — principally, the law enforcement agencies and the intelligence agencies — both to spy on political opponents. But as to use them in a way that could affect the outcome of the election,” Barr alleged. “As far as I’m aware, this is the first time in history that this has been done to a presidential campaign.”
[...]

https://www.salon.com/2019/12/10/wil...16-not-russia/

No wonder Drumpf ask the Ukrainians to look into Sleepy Joe's crackhead, whore knocking up, PoS son and his corruption... Payback is a bitch, ain't it?

[myboynoah]

Barr is a hack. Anything he says has Trump stink all over it. Not worth the attention.

[wapiti]

Barr is a hack. Anything he says has Trump stink all over it. Not worth the attention.

Do you think it's OK that the FBI spied on the Trump campaign as ordered by the Obama admin? Those are facts.

[PaloAltoCougar]

...

No wonder Drumpf ask the Ukrainians to look into Sleepy Joe's crackhead, whore knocking up, PoS son and his corruption... Payback is a bitch, ain't it?

You've provided countless reminders of the considerable moral shortcomings of the son of a presidential candidate. One can only imagine what you would do if we ever had a sitting president who, say, cheated repeatedly on three different wives, was accused by dozens of women of sexual assault, incongruously denies all of the accusations yet brags about committing sexual assault, who has derided multiple military heroes while pardoning war criminals, and having successfully dodged the draft, claims his personal Vietnam was avoiding venereal disease despite his many sexual conquests. With such a target-rich environment in which to work, I'm sure you'll do better than simply stick with the one-note play on his family name.

[myboynoah]

Do you think it's OK that the FBI spied on the Trump campaign as ordered by the Obama admin? Those are facts.

I certainly think it was okay for the FBI to look into Russian influence in the election. The Trump campaign was open to and sought information from Russian sources that it thought would advantage it in the election. Yes, that should be investigated. Those are the facts.

[myboynoah]

You've provided countless reminders of the considerable moral shortcomings of the son of a presidential candidate. One can only imagine what you would do if we ever had a sitting president who, say, cheated repeatedly on three different wives, was accused by dozens of women of sexual assault, incongruously denies all of the accusations yet brags about committing sexual assault, who has derided multiple military heroes while pardoning war criminals, and having successfully dodged the draft, claims his personal Vietnam was avoiding venereal disease despite his many sexual conquests. With such a target-rich environment in which to work, I'm sure you'll do better than simply stick with the one-note play on his family name.

Great list PAC. Add this:

Trump pays $2 million in damages ordered by judge over misuse of charity funds, according to NY attorney general

President Trump has paid $2 million in court-ordered damages for misusing funds in a tax-exempt charity he controlled, the New York attorney general said Tuesday.

The payment was ordered last month by a New York state judge in an extraordinary rebuke to a sitting president. Trump had been sued in 2018 by the New York attorney general, who alleged the president had illegally used funds from the Donald J. Trump Foundation to buy portraits of himself, pay off his businesses’ legal obligations and help his 2016 campaign.

[Uncle Ted]

You've provided countless reminders of the considerable moral shortcomings of the son of a presidential candidate. One can only imagine what you would do if we ever had a sitting president who, say, cheated repeatedly on three different wives, was accused by dozens of women of sexual assault, incongruously denies all of the accusations yet brags about committing sexual assault, who has derided multiple military heroes while pardoning war criminals, and having successfully dodged the draft, claims his personal Vietnam was avoiding venereal disease despite his many sexual conquests. With such a target-rich environment in which to work, I'm sure you'll do better than simply stick with the one-note play on his family name.

Yeah, I know... I don't know how Hillary puts up with that man. He was even caught under oath lying about it.

[SeattleUte]

You've provided countless reminders of the considerable moral shortcomings of the son of a presidential candidate. One can only imagine what you would do if we ever had a sitting president who, say, cheated repeatedly on three different wives, was accused by dozens of women of sexual assault, incongruously denies all of the accusations yet brags about committing sexual assault, who has derided multiple military heroes while pardoning war criminals, and having successfully dodged the draft, claims his personal Vietnam was avoiding venereal disease despite his many sexual conquests. With such a target-rich environment in which to work, I'm sure you'll do better than simply stick with the one-note play on his family name.

It seems that what most people hate about Trump is his indecorousness. There is enough about his governance and policies that either democrats or republicans ought to support enough to find him tolerable. For example, he has taken the wind out of Sanders' sails on trade and globalism, his protectionism being something democrats at least promised or threatened during elections, while making war with health insurers and pharmaceutical companies. His conflicts with China and support for Hong Kong should please both parties though perhaps for different reasons. He detests war, no matter how ignoble to avoid it, which ought to find support across the political spectrum. The left really doesn't support immigration as it drives down labor's wages and takes their jobs--that is they myth in any event and why the democrats are as to blame as republicans for failing to fix any immigration problems. The Koch brothers split with him on immigration and trade. His plain spoken condemnation of socialism is welcome to hear in response to the mendacity and false piety of Sanders and Warren. But he's boorish and a pig. How much should that matter? I'm just playing devil's advocate.