This argument seems to run like this. They hold the imperfect power of discernment except when they don't. Members can discern when they have discernment except when members can't. IOW, their discerning power is limited and imperfect, and imperfect members are left to discern imperfectly when these "special witnesses" are exercising good discernment and to forgive when they are not.
That's not a lot to go on in terms of relying upon anything they are doing.
That's not a lot to go on in terms of relying upon anything they are doing.
Comment