Originally posted by PaloAltoCougar
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
President Trump: Making America Great Again...
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by myboynoah View PostEveryone has their sacred cows. It's obvious the U.S. cannot police the whole world, but it can and needs to assert influence where it has strategic interests. It's about time we pushed back on Iranian and Russian influence in the region. Assad is their man. That we have made it clear he must go is a very good development.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BlueK View PostI hate to say it, and I'm definitely not a pro-war, we should police the world type of guy. But I'm not so sure this chemical attack wasn't just a test by Putin to see what the US would do. And if we'd done nothing I wonder if we wouldn't suddenly be watching a Russian invasion of Ukraine, Poland and the Baltics by now or pretty soon. The fact is Putin thinks (and not without reason, IMO) that Trump is a stupid chump he could push around.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Uncle Ted View PostMaybe it is the Russians (hackers) trying to drag the US into yet another costly war.
It's hard for me to criticize Trump for blowing up chemical-weapons-delivery materiel."More crazy people to Provo go than to any other town in the state."
-- Iron County Record. 23 August, 1912. (http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lc...23/ed-1/seq-4/)
Comment
-
Originally posted by Solon View PostMy wife's mostly-kidding theory was that Trump & Putin secretly planned all of this, so that people would back off from the Trump-loves-Russia investigations.
It's hard for me to criticize Trump for blowing up chemical-weapons-delivery materiel."There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
"It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
"Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster
Comment
-
President Trump: Making America Great Again...
Originally posted by Solon View PostMy wife's mostly-kidding theory was that Trump & Putin secretly planned all of this, so that people would back off from the Trump-loves-Russia investigations.
It's hard for me to criticize Trump for blowing up chemical-weapons-delivery materiel.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk"Discipleship is not a spectator sport. We cannot expect to experience the blessing of faith by standing inactive on the sidelines any more than we can experience the benefits of health by sitting on a sofa watching sporting events on television and giving advice to the athletes. And yet for some, “spectator discipleship” is a preferred if not primary way of worshipping." -Pres. Uchtdorf
Comment
-
Putting aside for a moment the question of why Assad would do such a thing as use chemical weapons (although I am not impressed with the conspiracy theories that abound becasue Assad has done this before), this situation was about perfect for Trump. He was presented with a violation of almost every international standard of conduct. Ever since WWI the world has drawn a bright line around chemical weapons. And, unlike Iraq, here Assad used them. The evidence was compelling and the images from the victims was sickening. Furthermore, the perpetrator was a Russian ally/puppet. So attacking him was not unlike attacking all those who claim Trump is in Russia's pocket. Moreover, the attack itself was carefully measured to respond in kind and measure to the chemical attack. Despite some of the more heated rhetoric, this attack was not about regime change or nation building, nor does it constitute a major escalation of our involvement in Syria nor does it constitute us policing the world. This attack was directed only against the instrumentalities of the chemical weapons attack. So Trump says you use these weapons (or "you cross a bright line") and that use will be punished. Trump was able to look firm, decisive, anti-Russian and not unduly aggressive all in one stroke. He was also able to please Erdogan and the Turks, as well as other anti-Assad forces, provide a counter balance to Putin's adventurism in the Middle East, satisfy the far right at home and give the left at home a hard act to criticize.
Plus, for a moment, lets consider the use of chemical weapons themselves: They are truly horrible and their use does deserve attack and censure. It is not a bad thing that people who might be inclined to use them will now think twice before doing so.
I also suspect this attack has been discussed very carefully in Pyongyang, where one can only hope that leadership realizes their only leverage comes from the threat of WMD use but once they use even one such weapon, it will be all over.
Bottom line for me is that I think this was a good move for Trump, even the right move. I am not confident he will have the ability to follow it up with the best possible diplomatic approaches, but hopefully Tillerson and Jared will help.
Here is the question I have: Did Syria know it was coming? We know the Russians were warned about the attack. Apparently they had no persons or equipment damaged in the attack even though they have military aircraft stationed at Hom airbase. SO if they were given enough time to get out of Dodge, does it seem likely they would not have warned the Syrians about the imminent onslaught?PLesa excuse the tpyos.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 8BR View PostHuge win for the alt-establishment (lol) in the last 24 hours. 4chan and Infowars types in FULL MELTDOWN. Sad!
Deep state FTW!
I'm bummed about not having a way to buy options on the use of the term "false flag."Te Occidere Possunt Sed Te Edere Non Possunt Nefas Est.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Goatnapper'96 View PostThere is a difference between the moral or even realpolitik justification to go after Assad and the fundamental reality as to whether or not the US, and by the US I mean the people, are committed enough to genuinely make a difference. That is a function of consensus and the degree of sacrifice we, as a unified people, are willing to endure in this foray. From where I sit our electorate doesn't understand why we are there, why what is happening is negatively impacting our world and how our actions will lead to a Syria where the negative things impacting our world will stop or if they can be stopped. The pure complexity of the issue seems to be an impediment to any consensus.
My opinion is they can be stopped but we are not committed enough to it. It seems that the best policy is to be involved enough to control the fallout to the best we can in our favor with our limited commitment.Give 'em Hell, Cougars!!!
For all this His anger is not turned away, but His hand is stretched out still.
Not long ago an obituary appeared in the Salt Lake Tribune that said the recently departed had "died doing what he enjoyed most—watching BYU lose."
Comment
-
Originally posted by creekster View PostPutting aside for a moment the question of why Assad would do such a thing as use chemical weapons (although I am not impressed with the conspiracy theories that abound becasue Assad has done this before), this situation was about perfect for Trump. He was presented with a violation of almost every international standard of conduct. Ever since WWI the world has drawn a bright line around chemical weapons. And, unlike Iraq, here Assad used them. The evidence was compelling and the images from the victims was sickening. Furthermore, the perpetrator was a Russian ally/puppet. So attacking him was not unlike attacking all those who claim Trump is in Russia's pocket. Moreover, the attack itself was carefully measured to respond in kind and measure to the chemical attack. Despite some of the more heated rhetoric, this attack was not about regime change or nation building, nor does it constitute a major escalation of our involvement in Syria nor does it constitute us policing the world. This attack was directed only against the instrumentalities of the chemical weapons attack. So Trump says you use these weapons (or "you cross a bright line") and that use will be punished. Trump was able to look firm, decisive, anti-Russian and not unduly aggressive all in one stroke. He was also able to please Erdogan and the Turks, as well as other anti-Assad forces, provide a counter balance to Putin's adventurism in the Middle East, satisfy the far right at home and give the left at home a hard act to criticize.
Plus, for a moment, lets consider the use of chemical weapons themselves: They are truly horrible and their use does deserve attack and censure. It is not a bad thing that people who might be inclined to use them will now think twice before doing so.
I also suspect this attack has been discussed very carefully in Pyongyang, where one can only hope that leadership realizes their only leverage comes from the threat of WMD use but once they use even one such weapon, it will be all over.
Bottom line for me is that I think this was a good move for Trump, even the right move. I am not confident he will have the ability to follow it up with the best possible diplomatic approaches, but hopefully Tillerson and Jared will help.
Here is the question I have: Did Syria know it was coming? We know the Russians were warned about the attack. Apparently they had no persons or equipment damaged in the attack even though they have military aircraft stationed at Hom airbase. SO if they were given enough time to get out of Dodge, does it seem likely they would not have warned the Syrians about the imminent onslaught?
And not that it's overwhelmingly important, but in diplomatic circles and at the UN I think the US with its rhetoric has to shame all countries that have condemned our action and paint them as being supportive of ruthless dictators who would gas their own people. I think our true allies want to see a US that would stand against something that immoral.
Comment
-
Originally posted by creekster View PostHere is the question I have: Did Syria know it was coming? We know the Russians were warned about the attack. Apparently they had no persons or equipment damaged in the attack even though they have military aircraft stationed at Hom airbase. SO if they were given enough time to get out of Dodge, does it seem likely they would not have warned the Syrians about the imminent onslaught?Give 'em Hell, Cougars!!!
For all this His anger is not turned away, but His hand is stretched out still.
Not long ago an obituary appeared in the Salt Lake Tribune that said the recently departed had "died doing what he enjoyed most—watching BYU lose."
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View PostSure. What could possibly go wrong going after WMD in that region of the world?Give 'em Hell, Cougars!!!
For all this His anger is not turned away, but His hand is stretched out still.
Not long ago an obituary appeared in the Salt Lake Tribune that said the recently departed had "died doing what he enjoyed most—watching BYU lose."
Comment
Comment