President Trump: Making America Great Again...

[frank ryan]

Maybe congress will impeach someone...

I take it some folks are feed up with the lack of response from Rosenstein.

Wrong thread Ted.

[Uncle Ted]

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018...ew-mccabe.html

The report faults McCabe for leaking information of an August 2016 call to Wall Street Journal reporter Devlin Barrett for an Oct. 30, 2016, story titled “FBI in Internal Feud Over Hillary Clinton Probe.” The story -- written just days before the presidential election – focused on the FBI announcing the reopening of the Clinton investigation after finding thousands of her emails on a laptop belonging to former Democratic Rep. Anthony Weiner, who was married to Clinton aide Huma Abedin.

The Journal's account of the call says a senior Justice Department official expressed displeasure to McCabe that FBI agents were still looking into the Clinton Foundation, and that McCabe had defended agent's authority to pursue the issue.

"Among the purposes of the disclosure was to rebut a narrative that had been developing following a story in The WSJ on Oct. 23, 2016, that questioned McCabe’s impartiality in overseeing FBI investigations involving [Clinton], and claimed that McCabe had ordered the termination of the [FBI's Clinton Foundation investigation] due to Department of Justice pressure," the report says.

That leak confirmed the existence of the probe, which then-FBI Director James Comey had up to that point refused to do. The report says that McCabe "lacked candor" in a conversation with Comey when he said that he had not authorized the disclosure and didn't know who had done so.

The IG also found that he also lacked candor when questioned by FBI agents on multiple occasions since that conversation, where he told agents that he did authorize the disclosure and did not know who was responsible.
[...]
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., said that the report showed that the decision to fire McCabe "was the correct one."

"According to the inspector general report, Mr. McCabe repeatedly lied under oath about the disclosure of information to a reporter. In doing so, he not only violated FBI policy, but he may have committed a federal crime," he said in a statement.

I am starting to think that McCabe, Comey, etc. would make great republican or democrat politicians... they seem to know how to lie, mudsling, and leak sh*t to the press like the best of them. Of course, working for the FBI is the wrong place to do it.

[frank ryan]

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018...ew-mccabe.html




I am starting to think that McCabe, Comey, etc. would make great republican or democrat politicians... they seem to know how to lie, mudsling, and leak sh*t to the press like the best of them. Of course, working for the FBI is the wrong place to do it.

You sound like Hannity.

[Uncle Ted]

Wrong thread Ted.

Oh come on, Frank... you need to tell us how Drumpf is behind all of this. Connect the dots for us.

[Uncle Ted]

You sound like Hannity.

I don't follow the guy... what is he saying?

[Jeff Lebowski]

I am starting to think that McCabe, Comey, etc. would make great republican or democrat politicians... they seem to know how to lie, mudsling, and leak sh*t to the press like the best of them. Of course, working for the FBI is the wrong place to do it.

Libertarian politicians never do this!

Because they never get elected.

[YOhio]

Libertarian politicians never do this!

Because they never get elected.

Uncle Theo JL

[frank ryan]

I don't follow the guy... what is he saying?

You guys clearly have the same twitter feed.

[frank ryan]

Oh come on, Frank... you need to tell us how Drumpf is behind all of this. Connect the dots for us.

I can't translate things into Alex Jonesese which seems to be what you speak these days, so sorry.

[Uncle Ted]

I can't translate things into Alex Jonesese which seems to be what you speak these days, so sorry.

Speaking in Alex Jonesese...

https://www.thedailybeast.com/alex-j...lasting-syria/

I guess he didn't like Drumpf being mean to the Ruskies' friends.

[Northwestcoug]

Libertarian politicians never do this!

Because they never get elected.

[frank ryan]

Speaking in Alex Jonesese...

https://www.thedailybeast.com/alex-j...lasting-syria/

I guess he didn't like Drumpf being mean to the Ruskies' friends.

At least he warned the Russians ahead of time.

[Pelado]

Speaking in Alex Jonesese...

https://www.thedailybeast.com/alex-j...lasting-syria/

I guess he didn't like Drumpf being mean to the Ruskies' friends.

smh at anyone who ever thought the Donald was ever "pure":

Trump's anti-interventionist base, in this case, Alex Jones, reacts badly to Syria intervention: "Is no one pure in this world?.... F**k Trump!"

[Walter Sobchak]

I'll use pictures, as it seems words is hard you understand goodly.

Here is a picture:

Spoiler for graphic photo of injured/dead children:

which, though unfortunate, was part of a civil war in a country that poses no threat to the USA.

Here are some other pictures (of many hundreds)... but these are children killed or maimed by US drone strikes:

Spoiler for graphic photos of injured/dead children:

Attachment 7871

It's OK though, because you can't kill terrorists without breaking a few eggs... amirite?

So while the former is unacceptable and requires an IMMEDIATE response unilaterally by the POTUS (acting as judge, jury, and executioner), our own bombing campaigns which have over the last decade+ killed or maimed thousands of women and children with no end in sight barely registers on the American public's give-a-shit-o-meter.

But, goddammit, we will not tolerate a dozen or so kids killed by someone else in some remote country halfway around the world from us. Nope. Because THAT crosses a line.

You will forgive me for being so glib earlier in my responses to your posts, but I was busy talking with my financial planner for most of the day. This isn't my first rodeo. I was in the same position over a decade ago arguing against an Iraq invasion (as was Pat Buchanan and Bob Novak (RIP) and many other "isolationists"). I know that it is pointless for me to try and win over the opinion of jingoists like yourself, YOhio, and others. We will be in Damascus in two years time toppling a statue of Assad; en route we will kill (and probably torture) the Syrian populace. It's just part of the process. But, this time around I'm going to put my money where Frank Ryan's mouth is and invest a good chunk of my kids' trust funds in Raytheon, General Dynamics, Northrup Grumman, Lockheed Martin, etc.

You see as much as I'd like my kids to live in the quiet cul-de-sac suburbia that I enjoy... living next to psychologists, college professors, optometrists, and other fake doctors; I'd rather have my kids living on waterfront property next to the *real* doctors, you know.. the kind that put orthopedic limbs on the vets returning home from the Middle East. So if I can make a little extra cash on this misadventure in the stock market, hey... so much the better. Because like the parents of the children that the US bombing campaigns kill; I've got dreams for my children too.

4 Hot Defense Stocks for Syria and a More Dangerous World
<https://www.thestreet.com/investing/...world-14553611

Lockheed Martin (LMT)
As I wrote yesterday, Lockheed' s older F-16 jet is considered a front runner in the Indian Air Force's potential $15 billion order for 110 fighter aircraft. Lockheed also produces the more modern (and stealth capable) F-22, and F-35 fighters. Both of these fighters are professionally thought to be effective against Russia's S-400 long range air defense missile system. That system is currently deployed in western Syria. Last week, Lockheed also won a $247 million contract from NASA to design and build an experimental aircraft that could operate without creating a traditional sonic boom. My price target: $375.

Raytheon (RTN)
First off, should the president decide to strike Syria without the use of American pilots, guess who produces the Tomahawk missile? That's right. These guys. On top of that, you might have noticed that two weeks ago, Poland agreed to spend $4.75 billion on RTN's Patriot missile defense system. By the way, this is the largest weapons deal in the history of Poland. Russia's annexation of the Crimean peninsula has not been lost on this former Warsaw Pact nation.

In addition to increasing the dividend, Action Alerts PLUS holding Raytheon announced in late March that under the Department of Defense's DARPA program, it was developing technology that could control swarms of both air-based, and ground-based drone vehicles that might be launched using a "drag and drop" visual interface. My price target: $245.

General Dynamics (GD)
This is one firm where we have already seen cash flows and margins improving. GD is also another defense name that increased their dividend in March. Think the Navy gets some love in the 2018 federal budget that earmarked $654 billion for the Pentagon? Me too. Know who runs the Virginia class submarine program? General Dynamics. In fact, the Navy just awarded a $696 million modification to that program for 2019.

One worry here is exposure to China. China is expected to be the hottest market for business jets over the next couple of decades, and General Dynamic's Gulfstream is the most popular business jet in that nation. Canada's Bombardier BDRBF is number two in that market, and eager. This will be a risk through the March 15 tariff hearing in Washington. My price target: $245

Kratos Defense & Security Solutions (KTOS)
The stock has performed spectacularly since being impacted by the negative press regarding the Spruce Point analysis in mid-March. This calendar year, Kratos has landed at least $187.7 million in a series of awarded contracts, the details of which are at times murky due to the nature of the business. Though Spruce Point was correct in its assertion that the firm has gone through "multiple reinventions now hyping drones," it is just that, the elite level unmanned drone business, that is poised only to grow at this point, in my opinion.

[frank ryan]

Michael's Cohen's 3 clients are Trump, some corrupt RNC d-bag who needed help paying off mistresses and Sean Hannity:

Michael Cohen Represented Sean Hannity, Lawyers Reveal

Michael Cohen represented Fox News host Sean Hannity, Cohen's lawyers were forced to reveal in federal court on Monday. “We have been friends a long time. I have sought legal advice from Michael,” Hannity told the Wall Street Journal. Cohen was present at a hearing where his attorneys are challenging the FBI’s seizure of documents he claims are protected by attorney-client privilege. Cohen’s other two clients in recent years are President Donald Trump and Elliot Broidy, a Republican fundraiser. Cohen negotiated non-disclosure agreements with Trump and Broidy's alleged mistresses.

On his radio show following the news, Hannity didn’t say why he worked with Cohen. “I think it’s pretty funny. It's very strange to have my own television network have my name up on the lower third.”

https://www.thedailybeast.com/michae...s-sean-hannity

[Uncle Ted]

Michael's Cohen's 3 clients are Trump, some corrupt RNC d-bag who needed help paying off mistresses and Sean Hannity:

Michael Cohen Represented Sean Hannity, Lawyers Reveal




https://www.thedailybeast.com/michae...s-sean-hannity

WTF, man. And there is the wife of Rod Rosenstein who clients are also d-bags:

I wonder if she and Cohen knew each other in law school.

[old_gregg]

lol. she was a us attorney numbnuts, of course she repped those parties

[frank ryan]

WTF, man. And there is the wife of Rod Rosenstein who clients are also d-bags:

I wonder if she and Cohen knew each other in law school.

Was she thought to have been doing illegal shit like Cohen? If not, weird post man. Cohen's apparent specialty was illegally paying off misstresses. I wonder if Hannity had him on as a guest.

[frank ryan]

lol. she was a us attorney numbnuts, of course she repped those parties

Whatabouting and deflecting for Trump means doing the same for Hannity. It's part of Ted's master plan to make people take Libertarians even less seriously than they already do.

[Uncle Ted]

Was she thought to have been doing illegal shit like Cohen? If not, weird post man. Cohen's apparent specialty was illegally paying off misstresses. I wonder if Hannity had him on as a guest.

I don't know, man. Did they convict Cohen of some illegal shit?

Bill had some mistresses and sexual harassees... maybe she paid off a few as well. You know that the government had a slush fund for that shit (which paid out more that $17 million) and Bill Clinton signed off on the bill that started it all.

[Uncle Ted]

What is up with all these FBI/DOJ people? I thought they were all friends but...

Comey Thinks Rosenstein ‘Acted Dishonorably’

FBI’s McCabe accuses Comey of lying about meeting on media leak

McCabe showed 'lack of candor' with Comey: DOJ inspector general report

It seems like these guys had a real great working relationship.

[frank ryan]

Also, Ted why do you keep getting your info from sketchy ass altright twitter accounts? That's just dipshitery.

[falafel]

Apparently Sean Hannity doesn't know what attorney/client confidentiality is. He admits to never retaining Michael Cohen, was never represented by Cohen, never revived or paid an invoice from Cohen. Yet he expects any conversations he had with Cohen to be protected by attorney/client privilege.

[Jeff Lebowski]

[Uncle Ted]

Also, Ted why do you keep getting your info from sketchy ass altright twitter accounts? That's just dipshitery.

ABC News is dipshitery? OK, if you say so.

[falafel]

ABC News is dipshitery? OK, if you say so.

I don't see anything posted in the last month by you from ABC news.

[Uncle Ted]

What is up with all these FBI/DOJ people? I thought they were all friends but...

Comey Thinks Rosenstein ‘Acted Dishonorably’

FBI’s McCabe accuses Comey of lying about meeting on media leak

McCabe showed 'lack of candor' with Comey: DOJ inspector general report <----

It seems like these guys had a real great working relationship.

I don't see anything posted in the last month by you from ABC news.

You just need to look above Frank's posting..

[falafel]

You just need to look above Frank's posting..

So by singling out ABC News, you implicitly admit that the rest of the sources are from "sketchy ass altright twitter accounts." Thanks.

[PaloAltoCougar]

Just wanted to mention how much I'm enjoying listening to Hannity tap dancing around the Michael Cohen issue. Hannity's trying to distance himself from Cohen while maintaining he's entitled to the attorney-client privilege while also dismissing his journalistic obligation to disclose his Cohen relationship while reporting on him--an impressive juggling act.

I'm also amused that Cohen has only three clients, two of whom have apparently never paid him anything. And finally, I wonder if Hannity had to explain to his wife that unlike Cohen's two other clients, Cohen's services were for a purpose other than paying off porn stars and Playmates. It's great how Trump, even indirectly, has elevated the level of public discourse.

[Commando]

I'd be pissed if I was Cohen! Getting used for free legal advice from a real thumbnail like Hannity? Oh helllll no!