Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The 2020 Presidential Election Primary Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by frank ryan View Post
    Jeff is too young to be a boomer. He is not part of my generalization
    Incorrect. He is, I believe, almost exactly my age and, if so, we are the tail end of the boomer generation.

    ANd your generalization is overwrought and incorrect.
    PLesa excuse the tpyos.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by frank ryan View Post
      Jeff is too young to be a boomer. He is not part of my generalization
      But I'm in the sweet spot (1952) of that generalization. I agree there are millions who rail against socialism while sucking at the government teat in so many ways, but it's absurd to lay this all at the feet of Boomers alone. One example of many: because we both held down jobs and had scholarships throughout undergrad and grad schools, my wife and I never borrowed a nickel to fund our educations, and would have taken time off to earn more if we needed it, rather than borrow. But many who came after us (this generalization thing is kind of fun...) took advantage of easy loan money, racked up irresponsibly high amounts of debt with the effect of jacking up tuition rates everywhere, and now come groveling to those of us who were less profligate, expecting us to pay off their loans for them.

      We should slowly push out the SS retirement age (I haven't started taking yet, so yeah, I'll wait a little longer), raise the cap, but not the percentage, on contributions, provide means testing to reduce, but not eliminate, benefits for the more responsible savers among us, and problem solved.

      Comment


      • at the boomers on here clapping back.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by PaloAltoCougar View Post
          But I'm in the sweet spot (1952) of that generalization. I agree there are millions who rail against socialism while sucking at the government teat in so many ways, but it's absurd to lay this all at the feet of Boomers alone. One example of many: because we both held down jobs and had scholarships throughout undergrad and grad schools, my wife and I never borrowed a nickel to fund our educations, and would have taken time off to earn more if we needed it, rather than borrow. But many who came after us (this generalization thing is kind of fun...) took advantage of easy loan money, racked up irresponsibly high amounts of debt with the effect of jacking up tuition rates everywhere, and now come groveling to those of us who were less profligate, expecting us to pay off their loans for them.

          We should slowly push out the SS retirement age (I haven't started taking yet, so yeah, I'll wait a little longer), raise the cap, but not the percentage, on contributions, provide means testing to reduce, but not eliminate, benefits for the more responsible savers among us, and problem solved.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by creekster View Post
            Incorrect. He is, I believe, almost exactly my age and, if so, we are the tail end of the boomer generation.

            ANd your generalization is overwrought and incorrect.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post
              Well said. Fix the disease, not the symptoms.
              No, no, no...throw big chunks of money at it
              "Discipleship is not a spectator sport. We cannot expect to experience the blessing of faith by standing inactive on the sidelines any more than we can experience the benefits of health by sitting on a sofa watching sporting events on television and giving advice to the athletes. And yet for some, “spectator discipleship” is a preferred if not primary way of worshipping." -Pres. Uchtdorf

              Comment


              • Originally posted by YOhio View Post
                I gladly accept this stereotype.

                "It's the boomers, its the boomers! Whhaaaaa. I had no choice but to go into debt because boomers!" Whatever.

                Now get off my damn grass.
                PLesa excuse the tpyos.

                Comment


                • Hey YO, can I get an animated gif?
                  "There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
                  "It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
                  "Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post
                    Hey YO, can I get an animated gif?

                    Comment


                    • Sweet. Thanks.
                      "There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
                      "It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
                      "Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by YOhio View Post
                        I love this gif. It looks like a disney animatronic mannequin gone haywire.

                        That's what you get with Russian software, I guess.
                        PLesa excuse the tpyos.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by YOhio View Post
                          Junior was such a great character.
                          "There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
                          "It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
                          "Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster

                          Comment


                          • Who will be the next democratic candidate to out flank the field on the left? I’m thinking it might be Beto when he announces his platform of forgiving all credit card debt to people making under $100k per year.
                            "Discipleship is not a spectator sport. We cannot expect to experience the blessing of faith by standing inactive on the sidelines any more than we can experience the benefits of health by sitting on a sofa watching sporting events on television and giving advice to the athletes. And yet for some, “spectator discipleship” is a preferred if not primary way of worshipping." -Pres. Uchtdorf

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by PaloAltoCougar View Post
                              But I'm in the sweet spot (1952) of that generalization. I agree there are millions who rail against socialism while sucking at the government teat in so many ways, but it's absurd to lay this all at the feet of Boomers alone. One example of many: because we both held down jobs and had scholarships throughout undergrad and grad schools, my wife and I never borrowed a nickel to fund our educations, and would have taken time off to earn more if we needed it, rather than borrow. But many who came after us (this generalization thing is kind of fun...) took advantage of easy loan money, racked up irresponsibly high amounts of debt with the effect of jacking up tuition rates everywhere, and now come groveling to those of us who were less profligate, expecting us to pay off their loans for them.

                              We should slowly push out the SS retirement age (I haven't started taking yet, so yeah, I'll wait a little longer), raise the cap, but not the percentage, on contributions, provide means testing to reduce, but not eliminate, benefits for the more responsible savers among us, and problem solved.
                              I'm not in favor of wiping out loans. That said, I'll make a small counterpoint to yours. In 1973 (I'll just pick that year because it's the year BYU Law School first opened its doors) the median family income in the US was approximately $57,000. Average resident tuition at a public law school was roughly $3,500, or about 6% of the median family income. In 2013, those numbers adjust to $25,000 for tuition and $65,000 for income. In other words, one year of law school tuition was about 38% of the median family income in 2013.

                              So don't put your shoulder out trying to pat yourself on the back, as perhaps you benefited from more than just your own fiscal responsibility
                              .
                              Prepare to put mustard on those words, for you will soon be consuming them, along with this slice of humble pie that comes direct from the oven of shame set at gas mark “egg on your face”! -- Moss

                              There are three rules that I live by: never get less than twelve hours sleep; never play cards with a guy who has the same first name as a city; and never get involved with a woman with a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Now you stick to that, and everything else is cream cheese. --Coach Finstock

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Donuthole View Post
                                I'm not in favor of wiping out loans. That said, I'll make a small counterpoint to yours. In 1973 (I'll just pick that year because it's the year BYU Law School first opened its doors) the median family income in the US was approximately $57,000. Average resident tuition at a public law school was roughly $3,500, or about 6% of the median family income. In 2013, those numbers adjust to $25,000 for tuition and $65,000 for income. In other words, one year of law school tuition was about 38% of the median family income in 2013.

                                So don't put your shoulder out trying to pat yourself on the back, as perhaps you benefited from more than just your own fiscal responsibility
                                .
                                Where did you get that number? That seems very high.
                                One of the grandest benefits of the enlightenment was the realization that our moral sense must be based on the welfare of living individuals, not on their immortal souls. Honest and passionate folks can strongly disagree regarding spiritual matters, so it's imperative that we not allow such considerations to infringe on the real happiness of real people.

                                Woot

                                I believe religion has much inherent good and has born many good fruits.
                                SU

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X