Originally posted by byu71
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
What's wrong with Texas?
Collapse
X
-
"There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
"It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
"Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster
-
Originally posted by byu71 View PostDoes anyone know without having to do a lot of research what percentage of southerners were slave owners?
http://www.civilwarcauses.org/stat.htm
Everybody who could afford them, probably. Slaves weren't cheap."There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
"It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
"Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View PostHa. Neither cowboy nor Tex have even posted in this thread, you dummy. DDD was making a joke about another thread.
However, I much appreciate you answering my question on slaveowners. Much higher than I would have guessed.
Comment
-
Originally posted by byu71 View PostLOL at you. I didn't say anything about this thread. I said a fight breaks out. If you were as smart as you think you are you would realize I was talking about the future, not current. It is like an if or suppose question. You dissapoint me. I thought you were as smart as you think you are.
Your backpedaling is worse than Uncle Ted's!"There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
"It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
"Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View PostYes, the textbooks don't deny that slavery existed. They just incorrectly present the root cause for the Civil War. From the next two paragraphs:
However, the requirement in the curriculum standards that compels coverage of “sectionalism, states’ rights, and slavery” (in that order) as causes of the war leads publishers to these sort of misleading – and even inaccurate – passages.
Because slavery is listed last it makes it "misleading - and even inaccurate -"? Slavery wasn't excluded as a cause. In fact, the sentences before this explain that the textbook(s) provided "thorough and accurate coverage of slavery" and how it led up to the civil war. Seems like yet another example of a lot of nitpicking over [the order of] words by someone that has a bone to pick."If there is one thing I am, it's always right." -Ted Nugent.
"I honestly believe saying someone is a smart lawyer is damning with faint praise. The smartest people become engineers and scientists." -SU.
"Yet I still see wisdom in that which Uncle Ted posts." -creek.
GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Uncle Ted View PostTo borrow another phrase you like to use... Oh brother.
Because slavery is listed last it makes it "misleading - and even inaccurate -"? Slavery wasn't excluded as a cause. In fact, the sentences before this explain that the textbook(s) provided "thorough and accurate coverage of slavery" and how it led up to the civil war. Seems like yet another example of a lot of nitpicking over [the order of] words by someone that has a bone to pick.
But you are probably right, Ted. Texas never does anything wrong and anybody who dares claim otherwise is a commie liberal."There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
"It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
"Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster
Comment
-
every state's HS textbooks, including northern states, have been wrong on the causes of the civil war for a long time. It's not just a liberal vs. conservative thing. It's more because of a push in the early 20th century to rewrite the causes of the civil war, and no matter where one lived back then, a much higher proportion of residents in any state would be considered racist by today's standards. Take the Kansas abolitionist John Brown, for example. If you read this book, this author presents what was written about him by his contemporaries and shows the vast difference to what later historians said about him. In his time, and for a few decades following, he was considered to be a Christian abolitionist who was a little overzealous perhaps. Certainly not insane. He just had strong principles regarding the evils of slavery and tried to do something about it. By the early 20th century and most likely in your HS textbook he had become a clinically insane monster. It's not just southern state textbooks that do this with the civil war. It was a national thing starting in the early 1900s that stuck and has lasted and been since perpetuated even by very liberal textbook authors since.
And yes, you can read what the leaders of the confederate states actually said and wrote when they seceded. It was very much about slavery for them at that moment. Obviously the economic benefits of slavery had a lot to do with it, but so did good old fashioned racism. IMO, a lot of the other arguments are early 20th century post-reconstruction era additions meant to make the south not look not so bad.
http://www.amazon.com/Lies-Teacher-T...eacher+told+meLast edited by BlueK; 07-08-2015, 12:13 PM.
Comment
-
This was a blockbuster movie hit where the hero of the show is the KKK. It was from the same era that textbooks and historians across the nation were rewriting the causes of the civil war. The problem is that it later became "established" history and wasn't challenged much for the rest of the 20th century, even after the civil rights period.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Birth_of_a_Nation
Comment
-
Originally posted by BlueK View Postevery state's HS textbooks, including northern states, have been wrong on the causes of the civil war for a long time. It's not just a liberal vs. conservative thing. It's more because of a push in the early 20th century to rewrite the causes of the civil war, and no matter where one lived back then, a much higher proportion of residents in any state would be considered racist by today's standards. Take the Kansas abolitionist John Brown, for example. If you read this book, this author presents what was written about him by his contemporaries and shows the vast difference to what later historians said about him. In his time, and for a few decades following, he was considered to be a Christian abolitionist who was a little overzealous perhaps. Certainly not insane. He just had strong principles regarding the evils of slavery and tried to do something about it. By the early 20th century and most likely in your HS textbook he had become a clinically insane monster. It's not just southern state textbooks that do this with the civil war. It was a national thing starting in the early 1900s that stuck and has lasted and been since perpetuated even by very liberal textbook authors since.
And yes, you can read what the leaders of the confederate states actually said and wrote when they seceded. It was very much about slavery for them at that moment. Obviously the economic benefits of slavery had a lot to do with it, but so did good old fashioned racism. IMO, a lot of the other arguments are early 20th century post-reconstruction era additions meant to make the south not look not so bad.
http://www.amazon.com/Lies-Teacher-T...eacher+told+me"There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
"It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
"Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View PostThe sentence in question is from the Texas BOE guidelines. And textbook companies have responded by incorrectly listing states' rights and other issues as the primary cause. And you are misreading that clarification (deliberately, I suspect). Go back and read page 28.
Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View PostBut you are probably right, Ted. Texas never does anything wrong and anybody who dares claim otherwise is a commie liberal."If there is one thing I am, it's always right." -Ted Nugent.
"I honestly believe saying someone is a smart lawyer is damning with faint praise. The smartest people become engineers and scientists." -SU.
"Yet I still see wisdom in that which Uncle Ted posts." -creek.
GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Uncle Ted View PostThe Southern States most likely felt like their rights were violated from everything surrounding the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850. The law was ruled unconstitutional by the Wisconsin Supreme Court but, surprisingly, the U.S. Supreme Court overruled and ruled the law constitutional. When the Northern states refused to return their "property" then the Southern States most likely viewed this as a violation of their state rights.
Originally posted by Uncle Ted View PostThe question is if there was no Fugitive Slave Act or if the US Supreme Court ruled the other way would there have been a civil war? I don't know but maybe things would not have escalated so quickly and just run their natural course to the abolishment of slavery without such a war. Was the civil war caused by economics, states' rights issues, or slavery? The answer is yes (to all of the above).
States' rights related to slavery? Yes.
The problem is when people promote the false idea that secession and the war were over economics and/or states' rights rather than slavery."There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
"It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
"Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View PostThis wasn't a violation of states' rights. It was a violation of federal law. In other words, the Southern states objected to the Northern states disregarding federal law and exercising states' rights in this instance."If there is one thing I am, it's always right." -Ted Nugent.
"I honestly believe saying someone is a smart lawyer is damning with faint praise. The smartest people become engineers and scientists." -SU.
"Yet I still see wisdom in that which Uncle Ted posts." -creek.
GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!
Comment
Comment