If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Trinity QB looks tiny and like he has no arm but man he threw a good deep ball. The backup QB for Bingham was much better then the starter. I also agree with Coach Peck, Bingham looked like they had never seen a cut block before and that was a huge advantage.
Trinity QB looks tiny and like he has no arm but man he threw a good deep ball. The backup QB for Bingham was much better then the starter. I also agree with Coach Peck, Bingham looked like they had never seen a cut block before and that was a huge advantage.
Trinity was definitely the better team, but certainly didn't dominate a Bingham team that lost quite a bit from last year. (to be fair, Trinity probably lost their share as well). Ultimately, it looked like Trinity simply had too much speed at WR and that RB is a big time player.
I agree that the back up QB was better than the starter for Bingham, but the starter wasn't bad. Bingham and Alta look to be a step above everyone else again in 5A.
also agree with Coach Peck, Bingham looked like they had never seen a cut block before and that was a huge advantage.
That's on the coaching staff. They should know what rules they're going to be under. At the very least they should have seen on film that Trinity would utilize cut blocks.
Comment