... and is ready to go, I wouldn't be surprised to see some old school two-back, two-TE, one-WR sets this year.
I'm a huge Scovil/Chow/Mumme/Leach guy. In other words, I love how the old BYU offense has evolved over the years into the 4-wide, screen-heavy offense of Mike Leach, but down at the B-Y-U, where the Pirate played rugby and where the average 40-time among the receivers doesn't always end up on the good side of 4.6, wide receiver screens often look more like a rugby scrum than a beautifully orchestrated football play. Considering our personnel, the combination of Unga/Tonga, Pitta/George, and Jacobson might be too tempting for the coaches to resist. I'm not saying our receiving corps totally sucks, but it's the weakest part of an otherwise nasty offense.
If Bronco has proven anything, it's that he's not afraid to tailor his systems to his talent. And if the Utah game has proven anything, it's that we should have kept running the freaking ball and playing to our strengths against their weaknesses. Then again, I'm just an armchair guy who hasn't been to a BYU practice in two years. For those of you who always get into closed practices, talk to Brandon Doman on a daily basis, have lunch with Talo once a week, and know every player's uncle, tell me where I'm wrong.
Incidentally, am I the only one who's not sold on O'Neill Chambers? I know all those 18-year old Mormon chicks from Vernal go ga-ga the first time they see a cut-up black kid from Florida, but he looked a little slow to me last year on kickoff returns. Ronnie Jenkins he was not. It looked like a classic case of throwing a guy a bone by letting him return kicks so he can feel like he's a part of the team even when there are 5 other guys who are better at it just so he won't transfer at the end of the year. I see him topping out at the Mike Reed level - solid, but not spectacular.
I'm a huge Scovil/Chow/Mumme/Leach guy. In other words, I love how the old BYU offense has evolved over the years into the 4-wide, screen-heavy offense of Mike Leach, but down at the B-Y-U, where the Pirate played rugby and where the average 40-time among the receivers doesn't always end up on the good side of 4.6, wide receiver screens often look more like a rugby scrum than a beautifully orchestrated football play. Considering our personnel, the combination of Unga/Tonga, Pitta/George, and Jacobson might be too tempting for the coaches to resist. I'm not saying our receiving corps totally sucks, but it's the weakest part of an otherwise nasty offense.
If Bronco has proven anything, it's that he's not afraid to tailor his systems to his talent. And if the Utah game has proven anything, it's that we should have kept running the freaking ball and playing to our strengths against their weaknesses. Then again, I'm just an armchair guy who hasn't been to a BYU practice in two years. For those of you who always get into closed practices, talk to Brandon Doman on a daily basis, have lunch with Talo once a week, and know every player's uncle, tell me where I'm wrong.
Incidentally, am I the only one who's not sold on O'Neill Chambers? I know all those 18-year old Mormon chicks from Vernal go ga-ga the first time they see a cut-up black kid from Florida, but he looked a little slow to me last year on kickoff returns. Ronnie Jenkins he was not. It looked like a classic case of throwing a guy a bone by letting him return kicks so he can feel like he's a part of the team even when there are 5 other guys who are better at it just so he won't transfer at the end of the year. I see him topping out at the Mike Reed level - solid, but not spectacular.
Comment