Alright. I'm curious y'all's opinion on this one.
My mom's invited to a huge formal wedding, right? It's a family from her church, and their daughter is getting married in four weeks. Everything's set, the invitations sent, the whole deal.
Except not.
The parents, last week, find out the bride is with child. She's four weeks along.
After recovering from their initial dismay, they cancel the church wedding, saying they no longer think a Christian ceremony is appropriate. They uninvite everyone, send back all the gifts, and have the couple married in an impromptu civil ceremony.
Maybe it's just me but this seems to be a little, shall we say, harsh. Setting aside for now the ramifications of the couple's fornication (I come from an upbringing where we like to use words like fornication to make these matters sound even more reprehensible and appalling), I find this decision very hard to justify.
The whole thing seems to me excessively neo-puritanical. Perhaps in addition to revoking the couple's wedding ceremony, we could brand the girl's wedding dress with a crimson A. Or better yet, we can go old-school and schedule a public stoning.
It just seems to me the couple must be suffering enough guilt and shame as it is. And here she's in the midst of her first pregnancy. She and the baby don't need anyone exacerbating her emotional upheaval. The girl would have only been eight weeks along at the time of the ceremony. They could have pulled off the original wedding with no one the wiser, and let the mathematically competent among the congregation figure things out on their own.
But no. They feel moved to go through all the trouble of canceling the whole shebang. How can this in any way contribute to anyone's physical, emotional, or spiritual well being?
What say you?
My mom's invited to a huge formal wedding, right? It's a family from her church, and their daughter is getting married in four weeks. Everything's set, the invitations sent, the whole deal.
Except not.
The parents, last week, find out the bride is with child. She's four weeks along.
After recovering from their initial dismay, they cancel the church wedding, saying they no longer think a Christian ceremony is appropriate. They uninvite everyone, send back all the gifts, and have the couple married in an impromptu civil ceremony.
Maybe it's just me but this seems to be a little, shall we say, harsh. Setting aside for now the ramifications of the couple's fornication (I come from an upbringing where we like to use words like fornication to make these matters sound even more reprehensible and appalling), I find this decision very hard to justify.
The whole thing seems to me excessively neo-puritanical. Perhaps in addition to revoking the couple's wedding ceremony, we could brand the girl's wedding dress with a crimson A. Or better yet, we can go old-school and schedule a public stoning.
It just seems to me the couple must be suffering enough guilt and shame as it is. And here she's in the midst of her first pregnancy. She and the baby don't need anyone exacerbating her emotional upheaval. The girl would have only been eight weeks along at the time of the ceremony. They could have pulled off the original wedding with no one the wiser, and let the mathematically competent among the congregation figure things out on their own.
But no. They feel moved to go through all the trouble of canceling the whole shebang. How can this in any way contribute to anyone's physical, emotional, or spiritual well being?
What say you?
Comment