Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pac 10 getting aggressive at Media Day

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • #1

    Pac 10 getting aggressive at Media Day

    Looks like they are tired of the SEC hype. So all the coaches started throwing out not-so-subtle trash talk in a bid to land their own lucrative TV deal. A few tidbits:

    The Pac-10 has the highest all-time bowl game winning percentage of all FBS conferences.
    The Pac-10 has a winning record against every BCS conference since 2000.
    The Pac-10 is 9-2 in BCS Bowls since 2000.
    The Pac-10 plays the lowest percentage of non-conference games against FCS (1-AA) opponents.
    The Pac-10 has the most all-time team national championships by conference (378) with the Big Ten coming in second (220).
    http://msn.foxsports.com/cfb/story/9...-game-in-%2709

    I asked Carroll if he could be in charge of the NCAA for one day, what changes he would make. He lit up saying, "We would have an awesome playoff system (sigh)."
    Fitter. Happier. More Productive.
    sigpic
    Tags: None
  • #2
    This thread should be in Ruby Soho's wheelhouse.
    Everything in life is an approximation.

    http://twitter.com/CougarStats

    Comment

    • #3
      Originally posted by TripletDaddy View Post
      Looks like they are tired of the SEC hype. So all the coaches started throwing out not-so-subtle trash talk in a bid to land their own lucrative TV deal. A few tidbits:

      http://msn.foxsports.com/cfb/story/9...-game-in-%2709
      I wonder how the Pac-10 stacks up if you were to take USC out of the equation? And if your gonna do that, take Florida out of the equation for the SEC as well.

      Which conference at this point is stronger top to bottom?

      Comment

      • #4
        Originally posted by Ruby Soho View Post
        I wonder how the Pac-10 stacks up if you were to take USC out of the equation? And if your gonna do that, take Florida out of the equation for the SEC as well.

        Which conference at this point is stronger top to bottom?
        Not sure, but part of the PAC 10's argument is that the conference is much stronger in athletics, period. The SEC argument only applies to football and some college basketball. Beyond that, is the SEC known for its athletics?

        If you are talking only football, I have no problem with the notion that, year in and year out, the SEC as a whole is tops in the country.
        Fitter. Happier. More Productive.
        sigpic

        Comment

        • #5
          [QUOTE=TripletDaddy;130525]Not sure, but part of the PAC 10's argument is that the conference is much stronger in athletics, period. The SEC argument only applies to football and some college basketball. Beyond that, is the SEC known for its athletics?

          Actually, the SEC is known for Football and Women's Gymnastics. Try and beat the Tide there Utes.

          I'd agree that as a conference the Pac-10 is stronger when you combine all athletics. However, in the South Football is King. We don't have to many pork eating, meth cookers interested in Crew or Water Polo.

          Comment

          • #6
            Apparently, Carroll has no pull in the PAC-10, then. The PAC-10 and its Rosebowl sidekick are one of the big reasons there is no national playoff.

            Comment

            • #7
              Originally posted by I.J. Reilly View Post
              Apparently, Carroll has no pull in the PAC-10, then. The PAC-10 and its Rosebowl sidekick are one of the big reasons there is no national playoff.
              Coaches have no votes in a playoff. School presidents/chancellors would vote on that. Same for expansion.
              Fitter. Happier. More Productive.
              sigpic

              Comment

              • #8
                Originally posted by TripletDaddy View Post
                Not sure, but part of the PAC 10's argument is that the conference is much stronger in athletics, period. The SEC argument only applies to football and some college basketball. Beyond that, is the SEC known for its athletics?

                If you are talking only football, I have no problem with the notion that, year in and year out, the SEC as a whole is tops in the country.
                The SEC does pretty well in track and field too.
                *Banned*

                Comment

                • #9
                  Originally posted by TripletDaddy View Post
                  Coaches have no votes in a playoff. School presidents/chancellors would vote on that. Same for expansion.
                  Oh, I'm well aware of that. You would just figure that since he is such an important part of the athletics puzzle at SC, and hence in the PAC-10, his opinion would carry some weight.

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    [quote=Ruby Soho;130537]
                    Originally posted by TripletDaddy View Post
                    Actually, the SEC is known for Football and Women's Gymnastics. Try and beat the Tide there Utes.


                    And the point of this is?
                    "Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy; its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." - Winston Churchill


                    "I only know what I hear on the news." - Dear Leader

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Ruby Soho View Post
                      Actually, the SEC is known for Football and Women's Gymnastics. Try and beat the Tide there Utes.
                      Utah gymnastics has more fans, so I couldn't care less if they beat us by a fluke here and there.
                      "I don't know the origin of said bitch booming."-Art Vandelay
                      "Hot Lunch posted awhile back on this. He knows more than anyone except for maybe BO."-Seattle Ute

                      Comment

                      Previous template Next
                      Working...
                      X