There is an article on KSL.com that talks about how BYU and Utah will both be hosting games on Thursday, August 30th (http://www.ksl.com/index.php?sid=209...on-opening-day). At the end, it mentions that 65,000 will be in Provo and 45,000 will be in Salt Lake. It got me thinking, what if one of those two schools didn't exist? Would football be as good in the state? Would ticket demand be just as high, only now combined (in other words, 110,000 would come out for the season opening game - if the stadium were large enough)?
Or, does the rivalry and co-existence increase demand for each individual institution, thus creating a larger combined level of interest? Just curious what you all think.
Or, does the rivalry and co-existence increase demand for each individual institution, thus creating a larger combined level of interest? Just curious what you all think.
They were a bitter rival when I lived in SLC and I would get yelled at to fk off from windows of passing cars when I rocked BYU gear in Sugarhouse, but now that I'm in a different state, I haven't really heard anything about Utah outside of when they play ASU or something and I remember "oh them." If we didn't play Utah it wouldn't diminish my interest in BYU, but the Utah game is interesting to me out of sheer history of the rivalry and the caliber of competition they bring. However, the BSU series could very easily take its place as the marquis rivalry-- especially since I have close friends and family that are hardcore BSU fans.
Comment