Is it reasonable to assume that if a defensive player is in on alot of big plays, something is amiss?
Ben Criddle comes to mind. He was a favorite of casual fans because he broke up passes, hit hard, and had his name called often by broadcasters. But shouldn't those casual fans have been asking why offenses were going at him so often? Or maybe, why he was having to cover somebody else's deficiency? Isn't that a clue that there's a problem?
Rob Morris comes to mind too. If he wasn't head hunting QBs, the secondary was getting exposed like a pair of jugs at a Motley Crue concert.
Do the best defenses tend to not have stars?
If I hear a defensive player's name alot early in the season, I immediately think the defense has holes.
Ben Criddle comes to mind. He was a favorite of casual fans because he broke up passes, hit hard, and had his name called often by broadcasters. But shouldn't those casual fans have been asking why offenses were going at him so often? Or maybe, why he was having to cover somebody else's deficiency? Isn't that a clue that there's a problem?
Rob Morris comes to mind too. If he wasn't head hunting QBs, the secondary was getting exposed like a pair of jugs at a Motley Crue concert.
Do the best defenses tend to not have stars?
If I hear a defensive player's name alot early in the season, I immediately think the defense has holes.
Comment