http://edition.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/af...female.condom/
The intent is good but the execution pretty screwy.
Apparently the rapist gets his penis caught in the condom's teeth and can't get away but the teeth don't break the skin? Are they referring to the female's skin or the man's skin? I don't get how this thing could be painful and prohibit the man from getting away and now break the man's skin.
Also, does it seem like a good idea to keep the rapist close to the victim in this situation? It would probably be worse if the condom was only designed to inflict pain. I could see rapists becoming enraged and doing something even worse to the victim.
The intent is good but the execution pretty screwy.
Apparently the rapist gets his penis caught in the condom's teeth and can't get away but the teeth don't break the skin? Are they referring to the female's skin or the man's skin? I don't get how this thing could be painful and prohibit the man from getting away and now break the man's skin.
Also, does it seem like a good idea to keep the rapist close to the victim in this situation? It would probably be worse if the condom was only designed to inflict pain. I could see rapists becoming enraged and doing something even worse to the victim.
Comment