This story is really starting to bother me.
So a single woman with SIX kids (ages six, five, four, two, and twin one-year-olds, all of whom were conceived in vitro, one of whom is handicapped), who divorced just a few months earlier, who has a history of financial trouble, and who lives in a 1500 s.f. house -- she asks a fertility specialist for another implantation because she "doesn't have enough girls yet."
And the doctor says YES?!!
And then the doctor implants like a dozen embryos just for the heck of it, even though only two or three at a time are recommended by the American Society of Reproductive Medicine.
This story is just too bizarre.
And I hate to jump to conclusions, but with the mother now unemployed I have a strong suspicion that it's going to come down to TD, Creek, Steel, and PAC (and the other 35 million residents of the Golden State) to support these kids.
And now the mom is auctioning off her kids' story to the highest bidder?
There's something rather ethically questionable about this entire thing.
So a single woman with SIX kids (ages six, five, four, two, and twin one-year-olds, all of whom were conceived in vitro, one of whom is handicapped), who divorced just a few months earlier, who has a history of financial trouble, and who lives in a 1500 s.f. house -- she asks a fertility specialist for another implantation because she "doesn't have enough girls yet."
And the doctor says YES?!!
And then the doctor implants like a dozen embryos just for the heck of it, even though only two or three at a time are recommended by the American Society of Reproductive Medicine.
This story is just too bizarre.
And I hate to jump to conclusions, but with the mother now unemployed I have a strong suspicion that it's going to come down to TD, Creek, Steel, and PAC (and the other 35 million residents of the Golden State) to support these kids.
And now the mom is auctioning off her kids' story to the highest bidder?
There's something rather ethically questionable about this entire thing.
Comment