Bronco doesn't want jc players it seems. I think this class could've used 3 or 4. A secondary guy, a rush end, a noseguard, even a marginal one and an olineman. Any thoughts?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
why no jucos?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by frank ryan View PostBronco doesn't want jc players it seems. I think this class could've used 3 or 4. A secondary guy, a rush end, a noseguard, even a marginal one and an olineman. Any thoughts?
Probably no schollies combined remaining to fill gaps? Lots of RMs coming in, maybe that too.
-
Originally posted by frank ryan View PostBronco doesn't want jc players it seems. I think this class could've used 3 or 4. A secondary guy, a rush end, a noseguard, even a marginal one and an olineman. Any thoughts?When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.
--Jonathan Swift
Comment
-
Originally posted by Coach McGuirk View Posthere are the returning missionary's,
"The first thing I learned upon becoming a head coach after fifteen years as an assistant was the enormous difference between making a suggestion and making a decision."
"They talk about the economy this year. Hey, my hairline is in recession, my waistline is in inflation. Altogether, I'm in a depression."
"I like to bike. I could beat Lance Armstrong, only because he couldn't pass me if he was behind me."
-Rick Majerus
Comment
-
Originally posted by Coach McGuirk View Posthere are the returning missionary's,
Do Your Damnedest In An Ostentatious Manner All The Time!
-General George S. Patton
I'm choosing to mostly ignore your fatuity here and instead overwhelm you with so much data that you'll maybe, just maybe, realize that you have reams to read on this subject before you can contribute meaningfully to any conversation on this topic.
-DOCTOR Wuap
Comment
-
Originally posted by frank ryan View PostBronco doesn't want jc players it seems. I think this class could've used 3 or 4. A secondary guy, a rush end, a noseguard, even a marginal one and an olineman. Any thoughts?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Indy Coug View PostBronco signed several JC players last year. They unsuccessfully searched for a JC safety this year. All things being equal, if your HS class is as talented as BYU's you take them over JC players. The logic behind that should be self-evident."Either evolution or intelligent design can account for the athlete, but neither can account for the sports fan." - Robert Brault
"Once I seen the trades go down and the other guys signed elsewhere," he said, "I knew it was my time now." - Derrick Favors
Comment
-
Originally posted by Blueintheface View PostWe hold these HS safeties to be self-evident, that all recruits are not created equal, that they are endowed by their High School coaches with certain intangible abilities, that among these are speed, athleticism, and the ability to backpedal and find the ball.
I will add that Gman is speculating that BYU is going to go heavy after JC DBs for 2011 and that will be their #1 recruiting priority.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Indy Coug View PostBronco signed several JC players last year. They unsuccessfully searched for a JC safety this year. All things being equal, if your HS class is as talented as BYU's you take them over JC players. The logic behind that should be self-evident.
Comment
-
Originally posted by frank ryan View PostHow do you define several? 4? I think 3 to 4 is a healthy number. This is the first class I can recall with zero jucos. I think it will hurt BYU next year.Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.
Albert Einstein
Comment
Comment