Just looked at Scout.com's top 300. The Cougars recruiting class has no rivals (no pun intended) among non AQ schools. Here's to hoping it translates on the field. http://recruiting.scout.com/a.z?s=73...pid=88&yr=2010
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Recruiting per Scout.com
Collapse
X
-
Interesting.
Why is Boise State so low (84)?"There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
"It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
"Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster
-
Maybe it's the blue field? In some respects, the low ranking is a testament to Chris Petersen's coaching ability.Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View PostInteresting.
Why is Boise State so low (84)?Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.
Albert Einstein
Comment
-
Those rankings are utterly worthless, especially right now. This has been discussed. Babs, junkie, BO, HL, everyone agrees. For one thing, they're to a large extent based on numbers of commitments, and BYU has twice as many as many teams. BYU has not only maxed out, it has committed a half dozen more than is even legal because the excess are mission bound. A team like Boise is so low right now because there's a pecking order of prospects, e.g., a prospect wants to go to Nebraska, who has its eye on a higher rated one at the same position who is waiting to hear from Florida. As the highest rated prospects commit the uncommitted ones have to take the best available school. Sometimes good ones drop down to Boise's level, so it's being patient. The same thing is happening to Utah.
BYU is unusual in that its commits have known for a long time that they want to go to BYU because they are LDS or just dweebs.
EDIT: Ultimately, everyone has rughly the same number of signees, so the final rankings hold some water. But in my opinion once you get outside the top 15 you're pretty much guessing. Who had the better class? No. 32 or no. 44? WHO KNOWS???!!Last edited by SeattleUte; 01-19-2010, 05:32 PM.When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.
--Jonathan Swift
Comment
-
Of course the rankings are speculative. But it is the off season and what else are we going to talk about? Notwithstanding the speculative nature of the ratings, I am excited to see how these prospects turn out. I think the line prospects ratings generally come closer to reality than the skill positions. The Cougars have some pretty good line prospects in this class. Potential is a wonderful thing.Originally posted by SeattleUte View PostAlso, as Junkie admitted the other day, Scout is a BYU shill.Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.
Albert Einstein
Comment
-
2005Originally posted by John McClain View PostJust looked at Scout.com's top 300. The Cougars recruiting class has no rivals (no pun intended) among non AQ schools. Here's to hoping it translates on the field. http://recruiting.scout.com/a.z?s=73...pid=88&yr=2010
43 Louisville (Conf USA) -- highest non-AQ
53 BYU
63 TCU
71 Utah
73 Boise
2006
46 BYU -- highest non-AQ
60 Utah
73 TCU
78 Boise 78 (2nd in WAC to #77 Idaho)
2007
42 BYU -- highest non-AQ
57 Boise
66 Utah
73 TCU
2008
48 Southern Miss (Conf USA) -- highest non-AQ
57 BYU
64 Boise (2nd in WAC to #60 Fresno St)
65 Utah
114 TCU (last in MWC)
2009
40 BYU -- highest non-AQ
54 TCU
55 Utah
60 Boise
2010
14 BYU -- highest non-AQ
66 Utah
72 TCU
85 Boise (4th in WAC)
Comment
-
Here's the take away. Beyond a relatively few special prospects the great center of the bell curve is virtually fungible. But coaches/programs aren't! Anyone who rejects Boise for Fresno or Idaho is stupid.When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.
--Jonathan Swift
Comment
-
Thanks for researching and posting that. The BYU 2006 class is now, after missions and redshirts, starting to see the field. The future is bright for the men in blue.Originally posted by scottie View Post2005
43 Louisville (Conf USA) -- highest non-AQ
53 BYU
63 TCU
71 Utah
73 Boise
2006
46 BYU -- highest non-AQ
60 Utah
73 TCU
78 Boise 78 (2nd in WAC to #77 Idaho)
2007
42 BYU -- highest non-AQ
57 Boise
66 Utah
73 TCU
2008
48 Southern Miss (Conf USA) -- highest non-AQ
57 BYU
64 Boise (2nd in WAC to #60 Fresno St)
65 Utah
114 TCU (last in MWC)
2009
40 BYU -- highest non-AQ
54 TCU
55 Utah
60 Boise
2010
14 BYU -- highest non-AQ
66 Utah
72 TCU
85 Boise (4th in WAC)
Comment
-
That's two BCS bowl wins to you, buddy.Originally posted by Hallelujah View PostRevenge of the dweebs? 4 ten win seasons aren't too bad for any program. I'm sure BYU fans would trade all those for 2 BCS bowl games though.When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.
--Jonathan Swift
Comment
-
Will Zac Stout be here in the spring? I forget if he was one of the ones that graduated early."Either evolution or intelligent design can account for the athlete, but neither can account for the sports fan." - Robert Brault
"Once I seen the trades go down and the other guys signed elsewhere," he said, "I knew it was my time now." - Derrick Favors
Comment
Comment