Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Santos ranking #30

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Santos ranking #30

    The other computer models don't refresh until after the bowl season, so if you trust my model, you'll have to wait. But I won't be too far off.

    #30. Let's be real about who we were this year. We were closer in power rating to the 2005 5-6 team than we are to the top 10.

    1-3 against top 50 teams with our best win against #45 Air Force.

    Unless we schedule better than SOS #108, we shouldn't brag about our 10 wins or point to them as evidence that it was a good season.

  • #2
    We don't agree very often, but you nailed it on this one.

    The reality is while being a 10 win team,,,we were dangerously close to being a 6 win team.

    We could've easily lost to Washington, UNLV, Colorado State and Air Force.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by RockyBalboa View Post
      The reality is while being a 10 win team,,,we were dangerously close to being a 6 win team.

      We could've easily lost to Washington, UNLV, Colorado State and Air Force.
      I could have sworn I'd seen you in the best-teams-win-the-close-ones camp before.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by beelzebabette View Post
        I could have sworn I'd seen you in the best-teams-win-the-close-ones camp before.
        and that changes how we could've easily been a 6 win team how exactly?

        Thanks in advance.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by RockyBalboa View Post
          and that changes how we could've easily been a 6 win team how exactly?

          Thanks in advance.
          Did I err in interpreting your previous comment to mean there's a difference between a team that wins the close ones (10 wins) and one that does not (six wins)? I understood it to mean that BYU would have to be a different football team to have failed to pull out those wins and therefore "easily could have been" would not apply.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by beelzebabette View Post
            Did I err in interpreting your previous comment to mean there's a difference between a team that wins the close ones (10 wins) and one that does not (six wins)? I understood it to mean that BYU would have to be a different football team to have failed to pull out those wins and therefore "easily could have been" would not apply.
            To the point of post and intent, I think it would be more accurate to say BYU was really close to being a 6 win team, switching out UCLA, Washington, Norther Iowa, and USU for four higher ranked teams, putting our overall schedule more similar to peers in the top 50.

            Anyone's a few bad breaks from a couple more losses (or couple more wins).

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by jay santos View Post
              The other computer models don't refresh until after the bowl season, so if you trust my model, you'll have to wait. But I won't be too far off.

              #30. Let's be real about who we were this year. We were closer in power rating to the 2005 5-6 team than we are to the top 10.

              1-3 against top 50 teams with our best win against #45 Air Force.

              Unless we schedule better than SOS #108, we shouldn't brag about our 10 wins or point to them as evidence that it was a good season.
              I think #30 is probably a little bit high. Where is Arizona in your computer model?
              Get confident, stupid
              -landpoke

              Comment

              Working...
              X